QTJA vs. LOUP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QTJA (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTJA is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. QTJA is actively managed, while LOUP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTJA returned 18.10%/yr vs 37.37%/yr for LOUP. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTJA charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.

Performance

QTJA vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTJA achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 28.21% return.

QTJA

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: 10.75%
• 6M: 11.53%
• 1Y: 26.02%
• 3Y*: 18.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LOUP

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: 18.57%
• YTD: 28.21%
• 6M: 26.83%
• 1Y: 75.49%
• 3Y*: 37.37%
• 5Y*: 12.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTJA vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QTJA Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January	10.75%	18.86%	18.47%	25.56%	-34.58%
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF	28.21%	43.24%	21.80%	51.31%	-46.28%

Correlation

The correlation between QTJA and LOUP is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2022	0.81

The correlation between QTJA and LOUP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTJA vs. LOUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QTJA	LOUP
Technology	54.2%	51.0%
Communication Services	15.5%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	2.7%
Industrials	2.8%	20.0%
Utilities	1.4%	2.8%
Basic Materials	1.2%	-
Energy	0.6%	2.9%
Financial Services	0.2%	4.5%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QTJA vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTJA

QTJA Risk / Return Rank: 74
QTJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QTJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QTJA Omega Ratio Rank: 86
QTJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
QTJA Martin Ratio Rank: 75

LOUP

LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 71
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 67
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTJA vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTJA	LOUP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.66	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	3.21	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.41	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	3.61	-0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.08	12.23	+1.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTJA vs. LOUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTJA Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the LOUP Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTJA and LOUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTJA	LOUP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	2.66	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.59	-0.31

Drawdowns

QTJA vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTJA drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTJA and LOUP.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTJA	LOUP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.07%	-58.68%	+22.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.75%	-21.00%	+11.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.73%	-35.23%	+13.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-1.87%	+1.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.29%	-20.04%	+6.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	6.19%	-4.34%

Volatility

QTJA vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) is 1.57%, while Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a volatility of 8.23%. This indicates that QTJA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTJA	LOUP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.57%	8.23%	-6.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.42%	21.94%	-12.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.72%	28.51%	-17.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.45%	32.38%	-11.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.45%	31.96%	-11.51%

QTJA vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTJA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTJA vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTJA nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTJA and LOUP in my portfolio?

QTJA and LOUP have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTJA or LOUP?

LOUP has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to QTJA (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTJA dropped -36.07% vs LOUP's -58.68%.

Which ETF is better, QTJA or LOUP?

On 3-year performance, LOUP leads with 37.37% vs 18.10% for QTJA. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, QTJA has been the lower-risk option at 1.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTJA or LOUP?

Over the 3-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 37.37% return vs 18.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTJA or LOUP?

LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTJA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTJA or LOUP?

QTJA and LOUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QTJA and LOUP?

QTJA is categorized as Options Trading, while LOUP is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTJA and 0.70% for LOUP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LOUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.