PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTJL vs. SOXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTJL vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTJL achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -94.09% return.


QTJL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.38%
YTD
7.41%
6M
6.99%
1Y
18.39%
3Y*
19.04%
5Y*
10Y*

SOXS

1D
-11.03%
1M
-41.63%
YTD
-94.09%
6M
-93.81%
1Y
-97.64%
3Y*
-87.76%
5Y*
-80.66%
10Y*
-79.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTJL vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTJL
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
7.41%21.07%16.50%42.39%-30.16%9.36%
SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares
-94.09%-85.53%-59.55%-84.56%15.76%-51.63%

Correlation

The correlation between QTJL and SOXS is -0.67, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

-0.79

The correlation between QTJL and SOXS shifts across timeframes, from -0.79 (all time) to -0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTJL vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTJL
QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXS
SOXS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SOXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTJL vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTJLSOXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.64

+0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

-1.00

+3.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.56

-1.51

+16.07

QTJL vs. SOXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTJL Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the SOXS Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTJL and SOXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTJL vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTJL drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, smaller than the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTJL and SOXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTJLSOXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-100.00%

+66.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

-97.88%

+91.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

-99.87%

+77.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-100.00%

+99.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-92.61%

+84.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

64.48%

-63.21%

Volatility

QTJL vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) is 0.59%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a volatility of 65.23%. This indicates that QTJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTJLSOXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

65.23%

-64.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

100.97%

-93.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.86%

117.61%

-107.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.29%

111.53%

-91.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.29%

102.14%

-81.85%

QTJL vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTJL vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison

QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QTJL
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares
62.55%10.79%5.45%9.22%0.19%0.00%3.58%2.30%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTJL and SOXS have a correlation of -0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXS has higher volatility (65.23%) compared to QTJL (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTJL dropped -33.40% vs SOXS's -100.00%.

On 3-year performance, QTJL leads with 19.04% vs -87.76% for SOXS. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 19.04% return vs -87.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.

SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 62.55%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

QTJL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SOXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTJL and 1.08% for SOXS.

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTJL and SOXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer