PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTJL vs. SOXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTJL vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTJL achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -91.63% return.


QTJL

1D
0.02%
1M
1.08%
YTD
7.18%
6M
7.93%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
10Y*

SOXS

1D
5.91%
1M
-54.82%
YTD
-91.63%
6M
-91.49%
1Y
-97.52%
3Y*
-86.60%
5Y*
-79.43%
10Y*
-78.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTJL vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTJL
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
7.18%21.07%16.50%42.39%-30.16%9.32%
SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares
-91.63%-85.53%-59.55%-84.56%15.76%-53.72%

Correlation

The correlation between QTJL and SOXS is -0.68, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021

-0.80

The correlation between QTJL and SOXS shifts across timeframes, from -0.80 (all time) to -0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTJL vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTJL
QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXS
SOXS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SOXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTJL vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTJLSOXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.59

+0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

-1.00

+4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.05

-1.43

+17.48

QTJL vs. SOXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTJL Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the SOXS Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTJL and SOXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTJLSOXSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

-0.96

+2.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

-0.79

+1.31

Drawdowns

QTJL vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTJL drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, smaller than the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTJL and SOXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTJLSOXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-100.00%

+66.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

-97.68%

+91.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

-99.80%

+77.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-100.00%

+100.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-92.61%

+84.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

68.11%

-66.84%

Volatility

QTJL vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) is 0.30%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a volatility of 44.24%. This indicates that QTJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTJLSOXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

44.24%

-43.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

84.19%

-76.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.99%

102.19%

-92.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.42%

108.21%

-87.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.42%

100.48%

-80.06%

QTJL vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTJL vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison

QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.53%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QTJL
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares
64.53%10.79%5.45%9.22%0.19%0.00%3.58%2.30%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTJL and SOXS have a correlation of -0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXS has higher volatility (44.24%) compared to QTJL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTJL dropped -33.40% vs SOXS's -100.00%.

On 3-year performance, QTJL leads with 19.18% vs -86.60% for SOXS. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 19.18% return vs -86.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.

SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 64.53%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

QTJL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SOXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTJL and 1.08% for SOXS.

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTJL and SOXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer