PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTJL vs. POCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QTJL vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QTJL vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTJL
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
-1.09%21.07%16.50%42.39%-30.16%9.32%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
-1.42%11.00%9.54%20.12%-1.26%4.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTJL achieves a -1.09% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's -1.42% return.


QTJL

1D
1.13%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
-1.09%
6M
1.75%
1Y
26.28%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
10Y*

POCT

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
0.25%
1Y
11.10%
3Y*
11.03%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QTJL vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QTJL and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

QTJL vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTJL
QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTJL vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTJLPOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

1.08

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.85

1.62

+0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.26

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.59

+0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.86

8.53

+2.33

QTJL vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTJL Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTJL and POCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTJLPOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.08

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.79

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between QTJL and POCT is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QTJL vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTJL nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
QTJL
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%

Drawdowns

QTJL vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTJL drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, which is greater than POCT's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTJL and POCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QTJLPOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-18.80%

-14.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.42%

-7.20%

-8.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-2.33%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-1.53%

-6.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

1.34%

+1.19%

Volatility

QTJL vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) at 3.31%. This indicates that QTJL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QTJLPOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

3.31%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

5.15%

+3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.29%

10.35%

+12.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

7.90%

+12.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

10.31%

+10.44%