QTJL vs. BEG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) and BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QTJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BEG.

Performance

QTJL vs. BEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTJL achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 667.79% return.

QTJL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 6.98%
• 1Y: 18.48%
• 3Y*: 19.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BEG

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 5.22%
• YTD: 667.79%
• 6M: 579.44%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTJL vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.39%	1.15%
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF	667.79%	1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QTJL and BEG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

QTJL vs. BEG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 71
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

BEG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTJL vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QTJL	BEG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.63	—	—

Drawdowns

QTJL vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTJL drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, smaller than the maximum BEG drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTJL and BEG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTJL	BEG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.40%	-59.85%	+26.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-12.65%	+12.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.84%	-16.70%	+8.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.27%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QTJL	BEG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.86%	212.09%	-202.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.30%	212.09%	-191.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.30%	212.09%	-191.79%

QTJL vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BEG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTJL vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTJL nor BEG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTJL and BEG in my portfolio?

QTJL and BEG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QTJL or BEG?

On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTJL or BEG?

BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTJL or BEG?

QTJL and BEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QTJL and BEG?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTJL and 0.75% for BEG.