PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTJA vs. PJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QTJA vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QTJA vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QTJA
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January
-3.69%18.86%18.47%25.56%-34.58%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
-0.60%12.78%13.76%19.87%-2.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTJA achieves a -3.69% return, which is significantly lower than PJUL's -0.60% return.


QTJA

1D
1.00%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
-3.69%
6M
-0.80%
1Y
21.22%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
10Y*

PJUL

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
1.12%
1Y
14.39%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
9.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QTJA vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QTJA and PJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

QTJA vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTJA
QTJA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QTJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTJA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QTJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTJA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PJUL
PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTJA vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTJAPJULDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

1.43

-0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

2.17

-0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.36

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.12

-0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.44

11.94

-3.50

QTJA vs. PJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTJA Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the PJUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTJA and PJUL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTJAPJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

1.43

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.83

-0.71

Correlation

The correlation between QTJA and PJUL is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QTJA vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTJA nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
QTJA
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%

Drawdowns

QTJA vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTJA drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, which is greater than PJUL's maximum drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTJA and PJUL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QTJAPJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.07%

-18.17%

-17.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.12%

-6.99%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-1.68%

-3.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.80%

-1.50%

-12.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

1.24%

+1.38%

Volatility

QTJA vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) at 2.93%. This indicates that QTJA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QTJAPJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

2.93%

+3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.88%

4.17%

+4.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.47%

10.09%

+11.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

8.58%

+12.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

10.12%

+10.63%