QTJA vs. PJAN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QTJA (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January) and PJAN (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January) are both exchange-traded funds - QTJA is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while PJAN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect January Series Index. QTJA is actively managed, while PJAN is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTJA returned 18.04%/yr vs 13.02%/yr for PJAN. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

QTJA vs. PJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTJA achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than PJAN's 5.32% return.

QTJA

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 6M: 11.47%
• 1Y: 25.66%
• 3Y*: 18.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PJAN

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 6.15%
• 1Y: 14.92%
• 3Y*: 13.02%
• 5Y*: 8.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTJA vs. PJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QTJA Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January	10.77%	18.86%	18.47%	25.56%	-34.58%
PJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January	5.32%	11.29%	13.45%	18.18%	-5.52%

Correlation

The correlation between QTJA and PJAN is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2022	0.88

The correlation between QTJA and PJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QTJA vs. PJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTJA

QTJA Risk / Return Rank: 73
QTJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
QTJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
QTJA Omega Ratio Rank: 86
QTJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
QTJA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

PJAN

PJAN Risk / Return Rank: 81
PJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
PJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTJA vs. PJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTJA	PJAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.58	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	3.80	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.55	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	3.24	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.89	17.28	-3.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTJA vs. PJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTJA Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the PJAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTJA and PJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTJA	PJAN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	2.58	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.90	-0.61

Drawdowns

QTJA vs. PJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTJA drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, which is greater than PJAN's maximum drawdown of -21.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTJA and PJAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTJA	PJAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.07%	-21.25%	-14.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.75%	-4.63%	-5.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.73%	-10.49%	-11.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-11.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-0.08%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.28%	-1.73%	-11.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	0.87%	+0.98%

Volatility

QTJA vs. PJAN - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) has a higher volatility of 1.52% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) at 1.05%. This indicates that QTJA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTJA	PJAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.52%	1.05%	+0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.42%	4.71%	+4.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.71%	5.80%	+4.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.44%	8.93%	+11.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.44%	10.60%	+9.84%

QTJA vs. PJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QTJA and PJAN have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

QTJA vs. PJAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTJA nor PJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTJA and PJAN in my portfolio?

QTJA and PJAN have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTJA or PJAN?

QTJA has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to PJAN (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTJA dropped -36.07% vs PJAN's -21.25%.

Which ETF is better, QTJA or PJAN?

On 3-year performance, QTJA leads with 18.04% vs 13.02% for PJAN. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTJA or PJAN?

Over the 3-year period, QTJA has performed better with a 18.04% return vs 13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTJA or PJAN?

QTJA and PJAN have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTJA or PJAN?

QTJA and PJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QTJA and PJAN?

QTJA is categorized as Options Trading, while PJAN is Defined Outcome.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.