PJAN vs. BUFR

In the year-to-date period, PJAN achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly higher than BUFR's 1.28% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFR's 1.05% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) and FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs (BUFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PJAN Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the BUFR Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJAN and BUFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither PJAN nor BUFR has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum PJAN drawdown since its inception was -21.25%, which is greater than BUFR's maximum drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJAN and BUFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) is 2.73%, while FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs (BUFR) has a volatility of 3.22%. This indicates that PJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.