PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTERX vs. QLEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTERX vs. QLEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6 (QTERX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTERX achieves a 29.67% return, which is significantly higher than QLEIX's 0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, QTERX has underperformed QLEIX with an annualized return of 11.14%, while QLEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.


QTERX

1D
-0.82%
1M
6.17%
YTD
29.67%
6M
33.06%
1Y
56.18%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
11.14%

QLEIX

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.21%
YTD
0.24%
6M
4.03%
1Y
16.06%
3Y*
27.66%
5Y*
21.80%
10Y*
12.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTERX vs. QLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTERX
AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6
29.67%32.94%12.02%12.66%-21.13%0.95%17.08%16.87%-16.22%37.22%
QLEIX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund
0.24%34.43%30.50%23.95%19.18%31.10%-13.92%1.19%-16.33%15.74%

Correlation

The correlation between QTERX and QLEIX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.36

The correlation between QTERX and QLEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (5 years) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTERX vs. QLEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTERX
QTERX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QTERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTERX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QTERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTERX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

QLEIX
QLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTERX vs. QLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6 (QTERX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTERXQLEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.41

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

2.65

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.07

8.34

+8.72

QTERX vs. QLEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTERX Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the QLEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTERX and QLEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTERXQLEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

2.22

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

2.17

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

1.14

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.12

-0.50

Drawdowns

QTERX vs. QLEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTERX drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, roughly equal to the maximum QLEIX drawdown of -38.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTERX and QLEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTERXQLEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.15%

-38.11%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-6.01%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.89%

-7.07%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.30%

-17.07%

-20.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.15%

-38.11%

-1.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-0.38%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.04%

-7.73%

-4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

1.91%

+1.49%

Volatility

QTERX vs. QLEIX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6 (QTERX) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) at 2.19%. This indicates that QTERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTERXQLEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

2.19%

+5.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.35%

5.57%

+9.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.96%

7.19%

+10.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

10.09%

+6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.90%

10.58%

+7.32%

QTERX vs. QLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTERX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than QLEIX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTERX vs. QLEIX - Dividend Comparison

QTERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than QLEIX's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLEIX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund
1.75%1.75%7.12%20.88%14.15%0.00%1.57%0.00%6.03%9.11%3.01%4.98%
QTERX
AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6
3.27%4.25%4.91%5.76%4.73%2.53%1.68%4.48%2.40%1.63%2.57%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTERX and QLEIX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTERX has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to QLEIX (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTERX dropped -39.15% vs QLEIX's -38.11%.

QTERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTERX and QLEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer