QTERX vs. BEMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6 (QTERX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX).
QTERX is an actively managed fund by AQR Funds. It was launched on Feb 11, 2012. BEMIX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 30, 2011.
Performance
QTERX vs. BEMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QTERX vs. BEMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTERX AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6 | 3.07% | 32.94% | 12.02% | 12.66% | -21.13% | 0.95% | 17.08% | 16.87% | -16.22% | 37.22% |
BEMIX Brandes Emerging Markets Fund | 2.96% | 47.83% | 4.01% | 22.53% | -15.91% | 1.68% | -6.17% | 18.60% | -15.56% | 26.00% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QTERX having a 3.07% return and BEMIX slightly lower at 2.96%. Over the past 10 years, QTERX has outperformed BEMIX with an annualized return of 8.53%, while BEMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.04% annualized return.
QTERX
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -12.18%
- YTD
- 3.07%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- 33.11%
- 3Y*
- 18.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
BEMIX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -11.64%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 11.40%
- 1Y
- 45.15%
- 3Y*
- 21.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QTERX vs. BEMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTERX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than BEMIX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QTERX vs. BEMIX — Risk / Return Rank
QTERX
BEMIX
QTERX vs. BEMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6 (QTERX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTERX | BEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 2.57 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 3.24 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.51 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 3.45 | -1.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.07 | 14.31 | -5.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTERX | BEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 2.57 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.61 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.48 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.24 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between QTERX and BEMIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QTERX vs. BEMIX - Dividend Comparison
QTERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than BEMIX's 2.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTERX AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6 | 4.12% | 4.25% | 4.91% | 5.76% | 4.73% | 2.53% | 1.68% | 4.48% | 2.40% | 1.63% | 2.57% | 0.00% |
BEMIX Brandes Emerging Markets Fund | 2.09% | 2.15% | 3.04% | 2.45% | 2.86% | 2.31% | 1.31% | 2.56% | 1.55% | 1.41% | 2.20% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
QTERX vs. BEMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTERX drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, smaller than the maximum BEMIX drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTERX and BEMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTERX | BEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.15% | -46.05% | +6.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.32% | -12.07% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.53% | -36.37% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.15% | -46.05% | +6.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.32% | -12.07% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.21% | -14.32% | +2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 2.91% | +0.47% |
Volatility
QTERX vs. BEMIX - Volatility Comparison
AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund Class R6 (QTERX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) have volatilities of 8.13% and 8.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QTERX | BEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.13% | 8.42% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.40% | 12.56% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.78% | 17.37% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 16.15% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 16.96% | +0.71% |