QTEC vs. QMAR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QTEC (First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund) and QMAR (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March) are both Nasdaq-100 funds from First Trust. QTEC is passively managed, while QMAR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTEC returned 17.36%/yr vs 12.12%/yr for QMAR. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTEC charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QMAR.

Performance

QTEC vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTEC achieves a 43.17% return, which is significantly higher than QMAR's 13.03% return.

QTEC

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 18.57%
• YTD: 43.17%
• 6M: 39.34%
• 1Y: 64.90%
• 3Y*: 32.59%
• 5Y*: 17.36%
• 10Y*: 22.85%

QMAR

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 13.03%
• 6M: 13.97%
• 1Y: 23.15%
• 3Y*: 16.71%
• 5Y*: 12.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTEC vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund	43.17%	22.28%	7.32%	67.02%	-39.83%	22.00%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	13.03%	10.89%	16.11%	35.47%	-16.56%	12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between QTEC and QMAR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2021	0.87

The correlation between QTEC and QMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTEC vs. QMAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QTEC	QMAR
Technology	87.9%	54.2%
Communication Services	6.2%	15.5%
Consumer Cyclical	4.0%	12.2%
Industrials	1.9%	2.8%
Basic Materials	-	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.6%
Energy	-	0.6%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

QTEC vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTEC

QTEC Risk / Return Rank: 79
QTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
QTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
QTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 77
QTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
QTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 71

QMAR

QMAR Risk / Return Rank: 96
QMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
QMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTEC vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTEC	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	3.82	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	6.00	-2.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.92	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.07	7.24	-3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.17	52.23	-39.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTEC vs. QMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the QMAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTEC and QMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTEC	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84	3.82	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.87	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.91	-0.31

Drawdowns

QTEC vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTEC drawdown since its inception was -58.86%, which is greater than QMAR's maximum drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTEC and QMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTEC	QMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.86%	-19.83%	-39.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.03%	-3.21%	-12.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.00%	-15.91%	-13.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.54%	-19.83%	-25.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.08%	-0.21%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.89%	-3.28%	-6.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.94%	0.45%	+4.49%

Volatility

QTEC vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) at 1.27%. This indicates that QTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTEC	QMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.51%	1.27%	+6.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.24%	4.85%	+13.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.97%	6.08%	+16.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.17%	13.96%	+15.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.50%	13.85%	+13.65%

QTEC vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTEC has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTEC vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTEC nor QMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.14%	0.15%	0.02%	0.44%	0.68%	0.91%	0.80%	1.29%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTEC and QMAR in my portfolio?

QTEC and QMAR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTEC or QMAR?

QTEC has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to QMAR (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTEC dropped -58.86% vs QMAR's -19.83%.

Which ETF is better, QTEC or QMAR?

On 5-year performance, QTEC leads with 17.36% vs 12.12% for QMAR. On fees, QTEC is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QMAR has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTEC or QMAR?

Over the 5-year period, QTEC has performed better with a 17.36% return vs 12.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTEC or QMAR?

QTEC is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTEC or QMAR?

QTEC and QMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QTEC and QMAR?

Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QTEC and 0.90% for QMAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.82 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.