QMAR vs. ITOT
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT).
QMAR and ITOT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QMAR is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Mar 19, 2021. ITOT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Composite 1500 Index. It was launched on Jan 20, 2004.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QMAR or ITOT.
Correlation
The correlation between QMAR and ITOT is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QMAR vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QMAR:
1.87
ITOT:
1.78
QMAR:
2.51
ITOT:
2.40
QMAR:
1.37
ITOT:
1.33
QMAR:
2.39
ITOT:
2.72
QMAR:
10.42
ITOT:
10.69
QMAR:
1.82%
ITOT:
2.16%
QMAR:
10.15%
ITOT:
12.99%
QMAR:
-19.83%
ITOT:
-55.20%
QMAR:
-0.02%
ITOT:
-0.53%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QMAR achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 4.10% return.
QMAR
3.71%
1.63%
10.31%
18.94%
N/A
N/A
ITOT
4.10%
0.81%
10.75%
23.89%
13.94%
12.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QMAR vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QMAR has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QMAR vs. ITOT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
QMAR
ITOT
QMAR vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QMAR vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
QMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 1.18% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% | 2.20% |
Drawdowns
QMAR vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QMAR drawdown since its inception was -19.83%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMAR and ITOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QMAR vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) is 2.37%, while iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that QMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.