PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTEC vs. GHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTEC vs. GHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and Graham Corporation (GHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTEC achieves a 40.25% return, which is significantly lower than GHM's 91.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QTEC having a 23.50% annualized return and GHM not far behind at 22.34%.


QTEC

1D
1.67%
1M
2.80%
YTD
40.25%
6M
37.40%
1Y
53.38%
3Y*
31.63%
5Y*
15.73%
10Y*
23.50%

GHM

1D
6.51%
1M
22.83%
YTD
91.23%
6M
73.96%
1Y
155.90%
3Y*
112.50%
5Y*
56.14%
10Y*
22.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTEC vs. GHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
40.25%22.28%7.32%67.02%-39.83%26.89%38.76%48.22%-4.62%37.78%
GHM
Graham Corporation
91.23%44.43%134.42%97.19%-22.67%-15.50%-28.39%-2.28%10.81%-3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between QTEC and GHM is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2006

0.39

The correlation between QTEC and GHM shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (10 years) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTEC vs. GHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTEC
QTEC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

GHM
GHM Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
GHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHM Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTEC vs. GHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and Graham Corporation (GHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTECGHMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.40

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

8.61

-5.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.49

20.86

-10.37

QTEC vs. GHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is lower than the GHM Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTEC and GHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTEC vs. GHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTEC drawdown since its inception was -58.86%, smaller than the maximum GHM drawdown of -86.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTEC and GHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTECGHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.86%

-86.11%

+27.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.03%

-18.21%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.00%

-46.46%

+17.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.54%

-52.63%

+7.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.54%

-74.83%

+29.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.83%

0.00%

-3.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-47.33%

+37.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.10%

7.50%

-2.40%

Volatility

QTEC vs. GHM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) is 14.21%, while Graham Corporation (GHM) has a volatility of 20.78%. This indicates that QTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTECGHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.21%

20.78%

-6.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.98%

39.95%

-17.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.11%

52.88%

-26.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.73%

49.63%

-19.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.75%

45.36%

-17.61%

Dividends

QTEC vs. GHM - Dividend Comparison

QTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while GHM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GHM
Graham Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.54%2.90%1.92%1.66%1.72%1.63%1.90%
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
0.01%0.00%0.02%0.14%0.15%0.02%0.44%0.68%0.91%0.80%1.29%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTEC and GHM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GHM has higher volatility (20.78%) compared to QTEC (14.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTEC dropped -58.86% vs GHM's -86.11%.

GHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTEC and GHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer