QTEC vs. GHM
QTEC (First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index, while GHM (Graham Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, QTEC returned 23.50%/yr vs 22.34%/yr for GHM. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QTEC vs. GHM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTEC achieves a 40.25% return, which is significantly lower than GHM's 91.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QTEC having a 23.50% annualized return and GHM not far behind at 22.34%.
QTEC
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 40.25%
- 6M
- 37.40%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 31.63%
- 5Y*
- 15.73%
- 10Y*
- 23.50%
GHM
- 1D
- 6.51%
- 1M
- 22.83%
- YTD
- 91.23%
- 6M
- 73.96%
- 1Y
- 155.90%
- 3Y*
- 112.50%
- 5Y*
- 56.14%
- 10Y*
- 22.34%
QTEC vs. GHM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 40.25% | 22.28% | 7.32% | 67.02% | -39.83% | 26.89% | 38.76% | 48.22% | -4.62% | 37.78% |
GHM Graham Corporation | 91.23% | 44.43% | 134.42% | 97.19% | -22.67% | -15.50% | -28.39% | -2.28% | 10.81% | -3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTEC and GHM is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2006 | 0.39 |
The correlation between QTEC and GHM shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (10 years) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTEC vs. GHM — Risk / Return Rank
QTEC
GHM
QTEC vs. GHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and Graham Corporation (GHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTEC | GHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 8.61 | -5.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.49 | 20.86 | -10.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTEC vs. GHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTEC drawdown since its inception was -58.86%, smaller than the maximum GHM drawdown of -86.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTEC and GHM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTEC | GHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.86% | -86.11% | +27.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.03% | -18.21% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.00% | -46.46% | +17.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.54% | -52.63% | +7.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.54% | -74.83% | +29.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.83% | 0.00% | -3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -47.33% | +37.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 7.50% | -2.40% |
Volatility
QTEC vs. GHM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) is 14.21%, while Graham Corporation (GHM) has a volatility of 20.78%. This indicates that QTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTEC | GHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.21% | 20.78% | -6.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.98% | 39.95% | -17.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.11% | 52.88% | -26.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.73% | 49.63% | -19.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.75% | 45.36% | -17.61% |
Dividends
QTEC vs. GHM - Dividend Comparison
QTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while GHM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHM Graham Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.54% | 2.90% | 1.92% | 1.66% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 1.90% |
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.44% | 0.68% | 0.91% | 0.80% | 1.29% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTEC and GHM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHM has higher volatility (20.78%) compared to QTEC (14.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTEC dropped -58.86% vs GHM's -86.11%.
GHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTEC and GHM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer