GHM vs. LLY
GHM (Graham Corporation) and LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) are both stocks. GHM operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while LLY operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, GHM returned 20.71%/yr vs 32.48%/yr for LLY. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GHM vs. LLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHM achieves a 65.20% return, which is significantly higher than LLY's -0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, GHM has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 20.71%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 32.48% annualized return.
GHM
- 1D
- 6.74%
- 1M
- 11.93%
- YTD
- 65.20%
- 6M
- 87.94%
- 1Y
- 169.59%
- 3Y*
- 110.60%
- 5Y*
- 48.85%
- 10Y*
- 20.71%
LLY
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 10.66%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- 43.44%
- 3Y*
- 34.95%
- 5Y*
- 40.65%
- 10Y*
- 32.48%
GHM vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHM Graham Corporation | 65.20% | 44.43% | 134.42% | 97.19% | -22.67% | -15.50% | -28.39% | -2.28% | 10.81% | -3.80% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | -0.64% | 40.25% | 33.30% | 60.91% | 34.26% | 66.08% | 31.04% | 16.14% | 40.45% | 17.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHM and LLY is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 1992 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
GHM:
$1.18B
LLY:
$953.37B
GHM:
$1.34
LLY:
$28.14
GHM:
78.98
LLY:
37.81
GHM:
1.54
LLY:
0.76
GHM:
4.96
LLY:
13.23
GHM:
9.02
LLY:
30.56
GHM:
$237.56M
LLY:
$72.25B
GHM:
$58.50M
LLY:
$59.75B
GHM:
$19.22M
LLY:
$32.97B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHM vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank
GHM
LLY
GHM vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graham Corporation (GHM) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GHM | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.37 | 1.15 | +2.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.36 | 1.71 | +1.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.23 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.28 | 1.92 | +7.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.87 | 4.78 | +18.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GHM | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.37 | 1.15 | +2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 1.25 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 1.08 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.57 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
GHM vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHM drawdown since its inception was -86.11%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHM and LLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHM | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.11% | -68.24% | -17.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.21% | -23.64% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.46% | -34.48% | -11.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.28% | -34.48% | -19.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.83% | -34.48% | -40.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.56% | +5.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.42% | -19.22% | -28.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.39% | 9.48% | -2.09% |
Volatility
GHM vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison
Graham Corporation (GHM) has a higher volatility of 12.76% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 9.11%. This indicates that GHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHM | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.76% | 9.11% | +3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.77% | 26.83% | +9.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.67% | 37.88% | +12.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.93% | 32.79% | +16.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.99% | 30.15% | +14.84% |
Dividends
GHM vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison
GHM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHM Graham Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.54% | 2.90% | 1.92% | 1.66% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 1.90% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 0.61% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.75% | 1.96% | 1.94% | 2.46% | 2.77% | 2.37% |
Financials
GHM vs. LLY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Graham Corporation and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GHM vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison
GHM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported a gross profit of 13.47M and revenue of 56.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.8%.
LLY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 15.64B and revenue of 19.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
GHM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported an operating income of -219.00K and revenue of 56.70M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
LLY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 9.19B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.4%.
GHM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported a net income of 2.85M and revenue of 56.70M, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.
LLY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GHM and LLY have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHM has higher volatility (12.76%) compared to LLY (9.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHM dropped -86.11% vs LLY's -68.24%.
GHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHM and LLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer