PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTEC vs. FXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTEC vs. FXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTEC achieves a 44.73% return, which is significantly higher than FXL's 31.98% return. Over the past 10 years, QTEC has outperformed FXL with an annualized return of 23.00%, while FXL has yielded a comparatively lower 21.15% annualized return.


QTEC

1D
0.07%
1M
22.39%
YTD
44.73%
6M
40.31%
1Y
67.84%
3Y*
32.86%
5Y*
17.61%
10Y*
23.00%

FXL

1D
-0.88%
1M
17.50%
YTD
31.98%
6M
30.18%
1Y
48.07%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
21.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTEC vs. FXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
44.73%22.28%7.32%67.02%-39.83%26.89%38.76%48.22%-4.62%37.78%
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
31.98%13.29%16.13%40.50%-30.44%18.20%54.20%38.66%2.72%35.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QTEC and FXL is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.92

The correlation between QTEC and FXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTEC vs. FXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QTEC
FXL

Technology

87.9%
88.1%

Communication Services

6.2%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
1.0%

Industrials

1.9%
4.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

QTEC
87.9%
FXL
88.1%

Communication Services

QTEC
6.2%
FXL
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QTEC
4.0%
FXL
1.0%

Industrials

QTEC
1.9%
FXL
4.5%

Basic Materials

QTEC

-

FXL

-

Consumer Defensive

QTEC

-

FXL

-

Energy

QTEC

-

FXL

-

Financial Services

QTEC

-

FXL
0.6%

Healthcare

QTEC

-

FXL

-

Real Estate

QTEC

-

FXL

-

Utilities

QTEC

-

FXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTEC vs. FXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTEC
QTEC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FXL
FXL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXL Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXL Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTEC vs. FXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTECFXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.35

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

3.56

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

11.95

+1.82

QTEC vs. FXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is higher than the FXL Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTEC and FXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTECFXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

2.16

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.54

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.84

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.56

+0.05

Drawdowns

QTEC vs. FXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTEC drawdown since its inception was -58.86%, roughly equal to the maximum FXL drawdown of -61.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTEC and FXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTECFXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.86%

-61.41%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.03%

-13.56%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.00%

-28.27%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.54%

-38.49%

-7.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.54%

-38.49%

-7.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.88%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.89%

-11.37%

+1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.94%

4.03%

+0.91%

Volatility

QTEC vs. FXL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) have volatilities of 7.34% and 7.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTECFXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.34%

7.61%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.26%

17.47%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.98%

22.42%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.19%

25.12%

+4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.51%

25.28%

+2.23%

QTEC vs. FXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTEC has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than FXL's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTEC vs. FXL - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTEC nor FXL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
0.00%0.01%0.11%0.41%0.34%0.11%0.04%0.37%0.32%0.27%1.12%0.36%
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.02%0.14%0.15%0.02%0.44%0.68%0.91%0.80%1.29%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, QTEC and FXL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FXL has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to QTEC (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTEC dropped -58.86% vs FXL's -61.41%.

On 10-year performance, QTEC leads with 23.00% vs 21.15% for FXL. On fees, QTEC is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QTEC has been the lower-risk option at 7.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QTEC has performed better with a 23.00% return vs 21.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTEC is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.

QTEC and FXL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

QTEC is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while FXL is Technology Equities. QTEC tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index, while FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QTEC and 0.61% for FXL.

QTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTEC and FXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer