QTAP vs. TSLG
QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) and TSLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QTAP returned 23.86% vs 36.71% for TSLG. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSLG.
Performance
QTAP vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTAP achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly higher than TSLG's -33.05% return.
QTAP
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 23.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.41%
- 10Y*
- —
TSLG
- 1D
- -13.33%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- YTD
- -33.05%
- 6M
- -35.69%
- 1Y
- 36.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 12.81% | 19.36% | -0.77% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | -33.05% | -26.70% | -16.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTAP and TSLG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between QTAP and TSLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTAP vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank
QTAP
TSLG
QTAP vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTAP | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.08 | 1.14 | +0.95 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.95 | 0.68 | +13.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 70.86 | 1.40 | +69.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTAP | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.15 | 0.42 | +3.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | -0.40 | +1.13 |
Drawdowns
QTAP vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and TSLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTAP | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.44% | -82.86% | +53.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.72% | -54.61% | +52.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -66.18% | +64.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -58.75% | +53.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | 26.25% | -25.91% |
Volatility
QTAP vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) is 2.03%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) has a volatility of 28.25%. This indicates that QTAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTAP | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 28.25% | -26.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.31% | 55.82% | -51.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.80% | 93.25% | -87.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 115.55% | -96.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 115.55% | -96.78% |
QTAP vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTAP vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison
QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | 9.78% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTAP and TSLG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLG has higher volatility (28.25%) compared to QTAP (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTAP dropped -29.44% vs TSLG's -82.86%.
On 1-year performance, TSLG leads with 36.71% vs 23.86% for QTAP. On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLG has performed better with a 36.71% return vs 23.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTAP.
TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 9.78%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTAP and 0.75% for TSLG.
QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.15 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTAP and TSLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer