QTAP vs. RGTU
QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) and RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QTAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for RGTU.
Performance
QTAP vs. RGTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTAP achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly higher than RGTU's -27.08% return.
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 14.58%
- 6M
- 15.43%
- 1Y
- 25.33%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 13.77%
- 10Y*
- —
RGTU
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 46.09%
- YTD
- -27.08%
- 6M
- -62.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP vs. RGTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 14.58% | 7.57% |
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | -27.08% | 80.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTAP and RGTU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTAP vs. RGTU — Risk / Return Rank
QTAP
RGTU
QTAP vs. RGTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTAP | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 79.40 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTAP | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.16 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
QTAP vs. RGTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum RGTU drawdown of -96.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and RGTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTAP | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.44% | -96.96% | +67.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -91.85% | +91.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -62.33% | +57.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.32% | — | — |
Volatility
QTAP vs. RGTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTAP | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.56% | 219.22% | -213.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 219.22% | -200.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 219.22% | -200.45% |
QTAP vs. RGTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than RGTU's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTAP vs. RGTU - Dividend Comparison
QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | 28.29% | 20.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTAP and RGTU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for RGTU.
RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 28.29%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTAP and 1.30% for RGTU.
Find the right allocation for QTAP and RGTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer