QTAP vs. CONL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) and CONL (GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTAP returned 21.18%/yr vs -14.88%/yr for CONL. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QTAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for CONL.

Performance

QTAP vs. CONL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTAP achieves a 14.67% return, which is significantly higher than CONL's -62.12% return.

QTAP

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 2.89%
• YTD: 14.67%
• 6M: 15.56%
• 1Y: 25.59%
• 3Y*: 21.18%
• 5Y*: 13.78%
• 10Y*: —

CONL

• 1D: -12.32%
• 1M: -38.47%
• YTD: -62.12%
• 6M: -75.31%
• 1Y: -79.34%
• 3Y*: -14.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTAP vs. CONL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	14.67%	19.36%	17.34%	43.32%	-17.66%
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	-62.12%	-58.49%	4.23%	641.63%	-78.28%

Correlation

The correlation between QTAP and CONL is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022	0.49

QTAP vs. CONL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QTAP	CONL
Technology	50.7%	-
Communication Services	15.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	8.7%	-
Healthcare	5.1%	-
Industrials	3.3%	-
Utilities	1.6%	-
Basic Materials	1.3%	-
Energy	0.7%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	100.0%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QTAP vs. CONL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

CONL

CONL Risk / Return Rank: 3
CONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CONL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTAP vs. CONL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTAP	CONL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.62	-0.57	+5.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	8.50	-0.65	+9.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.23	0.93	+1.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.20	-0.86	+16.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	80.04	-1.21	+81.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTAP vs. CONL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTAP Sharpe Ratio is 4.62, which is higher than the CONL Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTAP and CONL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTAP	CONL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.62	-0.57	+5.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	-0.20	+0.95

Drawdowns

QTAP vs. CONL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum CONL drawdown of -93.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and CONL.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTAP	CONL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.44%	-93.95%	+64.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.69%	-92.02%	+90.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.03%	-93.95%	+80.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-93.48%	+93.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.04%	-55.95%	+50.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.32%	65.74%	-65.42%

Volatility

QTAP vs. CONL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) is 1.33%, while GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) has a volatility of 38.02%. This indicates that QTAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTAP	CONL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.33%	38.02%	-36.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.97%	101.03%	-97.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.56%	139.40%	-133.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.89%	149.93%	-131.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.77%	149.93%	-131.16%

QTAP vs. CONL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than CONL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTAP vs. CONL - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTAP nor CONL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.31%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTAP and CONL in my portfolio?

QTAP and CONL have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTAP or CONL?

CONL has higher volatility (38.02%) compared to QTAP (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTAP dropped -29.44% vs CONL's -93.95%.

Which ETF is better, QTAP or CONL?

On 3-year performance, QTAP leads with 21.18% vs -14.88% for CONL. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTAP or CONL?

Over the 3-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 21.18% return vs -14.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTAP or CONL?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTAP or CONL?

QTAP and CONL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QTAP and CONL?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTAP and 1.15% for CONL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.