QTAP vs. BULZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ).

QTAP and BULZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QTAP is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021. BULZ is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021.

Performance

QTAP vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QTAP vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	3.02%	19.36%	17.34%	43.32%	-25.87%	5.77%
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	-28.68%	60.09%	54.09%	394.22%	-92.26%	12.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTAP achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly higher than BULZ's -28.68% return.

QTAP

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: 1.79%
• YTD: 3.02%
• 6M: 5.43%
• 1Y: 21.08%
• 3Y*: 19.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BULZ

• 1D: 5.23%
• 1M: -12.77%
• YTD: -28.68%
• 6M: -31.57%
• 1Y: 72.81%
• 3Y*: 59.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTAP vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BULZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

BULZ

MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN

QTAP

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April

Return for Risk

QTAP vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 80
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

BULZ

BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 50
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 56
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTAP vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTAP	BULZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	0.79	+0.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	1.58	+0.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.22	+0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	1.43	+0.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.95	3.83	+9.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTAP vs. BULZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the BULZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTAP and BULZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTAP	BULZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	0.79	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	-0.06	+0.70

Correlation

The correlation between QTAP and BULZ is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QTAP vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTAP nor BULZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QTAP vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and BULZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTAP	BULZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.44%	-94.44%	+65.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.04%	-54.22%	+42.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-46.52%	+46.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.21%	-60.15%	+54.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	20.25%	-18.57%

Volatility

QTAP vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) is 1.88%, while MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) has a volatility of 29.26%. This indicates that QTAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTAP	BULZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.88%	29.26%	-27.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.23%	60.63%	-57.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.38%	92.48%	-76.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.03%	91.56%	-72.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.03%	91.56%	-72.53%