QTAP vs. BAPR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) and BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - QTAP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while BAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April. QTAP is actively managed, while BAPR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTAP returned 13.78%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for BAPR. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

QTAP vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTAP achieves a 14.67% return, which is significantly higher than BAPR's 10.81% return.

QTAP

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 2.89%
• YTD: 14.67%
• 6M: 15.56%
• 1Y: 25.59%
• 3Y*: 21.18%
• 5Y*: 13.78%
• 10Y*: —

BAPR

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 10.81%
• 6M: 11.74%
• 1Y: 20.12%
• 3Y*: 15.31%
• 5Y*: 11.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTAP vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	14.67%	19.36%	17.34%	43.32%	-25.87%	15.63%
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	10.81%	8.28%	15.95%	23.16%	-7.04%	10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between QTAP and BAPR is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021	0.89

The correlation between QTAP and BAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTAP vs. BAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QTAP	BAPR
Technology	50.7%	36.2%
Communication Services	15.8%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	8.7%	4.9%
Healthcare	5.1%	8.4%
Industrials	3.3%	8.1%
Utilities	1.6%	2.3%
Basic Materials	1.3%	1.8%
Energy	0.7%	3.5%
Financial Services	0.2%	11.9%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.9%

Return for Risk

QTAP vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

BAPR

BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTAP vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTAP	BAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.62	3.59	+1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	8.50	6.11	+2.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.23	1.87	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.20	10.46	+4.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	80.04	57.55	+22.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTAP vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTAP Sharpe Ratio is 4.62, which is comparable to the BAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTAP and BAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTAP	BAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.62	3.59	+1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.98	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.84	-0.08

Drawdowns

QTAP vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, which is greater than BAPR's maximum drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and BAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTAP	BAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.44%	-23.91%	-5.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.69%	-1.93%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.03%	-15.58%	+2.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.44%	-15.58%	-13.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.23%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.04%	-2.59%	-2.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.32%	0.35%	-0.03%

Volatility

QTAP vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) at 1.06%. This indicates that QTAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTAP	BAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.33%	1.06%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.97%	4.53%	-0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.56%	5.64%	-0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.89%	11.49%	+7.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.77%	13.12%	+5.65%

QTAP vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QTAP and BAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

QTAP vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTAP nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTAP and BAPR in my portfolio?

QTAP and BAPR have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTAP or BAPR?

QTAP has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to BAPR (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTAP dropped -29.44% vs BAPR's -23.91%.

Which ETF is better, QTAP or BAPR?

On 5-year performance, QTAP leads with 13.78% vs 11.17% for BAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, BAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTAP or BAPR?

Over the 5-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 13.78% return vs 11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTAP or BAPR?

QTAP and BAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTAP or BAPR?

QTAP and BAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QTAP and BAPR?

QTAP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BAPR is Defined Outcome.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs 3.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.