PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTAP vs. ARMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTAP vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTAP achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 841.05% return.


QTAP

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.33%
YTD
14.58%
6M
15.43%
1Y
25.33%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*

ARMG

1D
-9.19%
1M
211.14%
YTD
841.05%
6M
460.44%
1Y
443.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTAP vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QTAP and ARMG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025

0.58

The correlation between QTAP and ARMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTAP vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMG
ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTAP vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTAPARMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.21

1.43

+0.78

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.04

6.57

+8.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

79.40

11.59

+67.81

QTAP vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTAP Sharpe Ratio is 4.57, which is higher than the ARMG Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTAP and ARMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTAPARMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.57

3.43

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.10

-0.35

Drawdowns

QTAP vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and ARMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTAPARMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.44%

-80.28%

+50.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.69%

-68.13%

+66.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-9.19%

+9.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-52.91%

+47.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

38.55%

-38.23%

Volatility

QTAP vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) is 1.30%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a volatility of 66.47%. This indicates that QTAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTAPARMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

66.47%

-65.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.98%

104.49%

-100.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.56%

130.67%

-125.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.88%

138.36%

-119.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.77%

138.36%

-119.59%

QTAP vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTAP vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QTAP and ARMG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARMG has higher volatility (66.47%) compared to QTAP (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTAP dropped -29.44% vs ARMG's -80.28%.

On 1-year performance, ARMG leads with 443.95% vs 25.33% for QTAP. On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ARMG has performed better with a 443.95% return vs 25.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTAP.

ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTAP and 0.75% for ARMG.

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.57 vs 3.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTAP and ARMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer