QSU vs. QTUM
QSU (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. QSU is actively managed, while QTUM is passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QSU charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
QSU vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSU achieves a -70.86% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 41.88% return.
QSU
- 1D
- -14.15%
- 1M
- -42.07%
- 6M
- -73.99%
- YTD
- -70.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- -7.45%
- 6M
- 38.44%
- YTD
- 41.88%
- 1Y
- 67.35%
- 3Y*
- 46.28%
- 5Y*
- 26.76%
- 10Y*
- —
QSU vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QSU Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF | -70.86% | -65.11% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 41.88% | -0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSU and QTUM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSU vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
QSU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTUM
QSU vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF (QSU) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSU | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSU vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSU drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSU and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSU | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.77% | -38.45% | -54.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.07% | -8.00% | -84.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.36% | -8.21% | -67.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.33% | — |
Volatility
QSU vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSU | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 154.34% | 29.88% | +124.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 154.34% | 27.34% | +127.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 154.34% | 27.54% | +126.80% |
QSU vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSU has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSU vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
QSU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSU Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.76% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSU and QTUM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for QSU.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for QSU.
QSU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for QSU and 0.40% for QTUM.
Find the right allocation for QSU and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer