QSU vs. AIPO
QSU (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while AIPO is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. QSU is actively managed, while AIPO is passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QSU charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
QSU vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSU achieves a -85.70% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 37.75% return.
QSU
- 1D
- -25.63%
- 1M
- -56.89%
- 6M
- -86.22%
- YTD
- -85.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AIPO
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -7.89%
- 6M
- 24.01%
- YTD
- 37.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.30M | $40.49M | $45.57M | |
| $1.22M | $1.05M | $1.81M |
QSU vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QSU Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF | -85.70% | -65.11% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 37.75% | -9.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSU and AIPO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSU vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF (QSU) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSU vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSU drawdown since its inception was -96.11%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSU and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSU | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.11% | -17.31% | -78.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.11% | -12.37% | -83.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.73% | -4.95% | -71.78% |
Volatility
QSU vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSU | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 154.55% | 35.83% | +118.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 154.55% | 35.83% | +118.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 154.55% | 35.83% | +118.72% |
QSU vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSU has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSU vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
QSU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
QSU Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSU and AIPO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for QSU.
AIPO has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for QSU.
QSU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AIPO is Artificial Intelligence. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for QSU and 0.69% for AIPO.
Find the right allocation for QSU and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer