PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSU vs. AIPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSU vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF (QSU) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSU achieves a -70.86% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 40.28% return.


QSU

1D
-14.15%
1M
-42.07%
6M
-73.99%
YTD
-70.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIPO

1D
-3.12%
1M
-7.73%
6M
34.04%
YTD
40.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSU vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QSU and AIPO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSU vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF (QSU) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QSU vs. AIPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QSU vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSU drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSU and AIPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSUAIPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.77%

-17.31%

-75.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.07%

-10.76%

-81.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.36%

-4.51%

-70.85%

Volatility

QSU vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSUAIPODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

154.34%

35.87%

+118.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

154.34%

35.87%

+118.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

154.34%

35.87%

+118.47%

QSU vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSU has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

QSU vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison

QSU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QSU and AIPO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for QSU.

AIPO has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for QSU.

QSU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AIPO is Building & Construction. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for QSU and 0.69% for AIPO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSU and AIPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer