QSU vs. ARMG
QSU (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QSU charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARMG.
Performance
QSU vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSU achieves a -85.70% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 317.89% return.
QSU
- 1D
- -25.63%
- 1M
- -56.89%
- 6M
- -86.22%
- YTD
- -85.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ARMG
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -44.06%
- 6M
- 258.20%
- YTD
- 317.89%
- 1Y
- 66.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 34.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.06M | $29.69M | $68.79M | |
| $1.22M | $1.05M | $1.81M |
QSU vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QSU Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF | -85.70% | -65.11% |
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 317.89% | -61.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSU and ARMG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSU vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank
QSU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARMG
QSU vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF (QSU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSU | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSU vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSU drawdown since its inception was -96.11%, which is greater than ARMG's maximum drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSU and ARMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSU | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.11% | -80.28% | -15.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -68.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.11% | -61.88% | -34.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.73% | -51.83% | -24.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 41.37% | — |
Volatility
QSU vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSU | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 42.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 124.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 154.55% | 145.86% | +8.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 154.55% | 144.09% | +10.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 154.55% | 144.09% | +10.46% |
QSU vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSU has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSU vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison
QSU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 1.16% | 4.86% |
QSU Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSU and ARMG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for QSU.
ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.00% for QSU.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for QSU and 0.75% for ARMG.
Find the right allocation for QSU and ARMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer