QSU vs. NBIG
QSU (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QSU charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.
Performance
QSU vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSU achieves a -80.79% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 129.20% return.
QSU
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- -34.38%
- 6M
- -80.73%
- YTD
- -80.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIG
- 1D
- 7.58%
- 1M
- -64.93%
- 6M
- 40.44%
- YTD
- 129.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QSU vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QSU Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF | -80.79% | -68.28% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 129.20% | -59.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSU and NBIG is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSU vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long QS ETF (QSU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSU vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSU drawdown since its inception was -94.77%, which is greater than NBIG's maximum drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSU and NBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSU | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.77% | -75.83% | -18.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.77% | -66.20% | -28.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.34% | -40.93% | -35.41% |
Volatility
QSU vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSU | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 153.29% | 204.34% | -51.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 153.29% | 204.34% | -51.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 153.29% | 204.34% | -51.05% |
QSU vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSU has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSU vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison
Neither QSU nor NBIG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QSU and NBIG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for QSU.
QSU and NBIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for QSU and 0.75% for NBIG.
Find the right allocation for QSU and NBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer