PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSTFX vs. QBDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSTFX vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSTFX achieves a 18.84% return, which is significantly higher than QBDSX's 0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, QSTFX has outperformed QBDSX with an annualized return of 17.96%, while QBDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.80% annualized return.


QSTFX

1D
0.05%
1M
11.77%
YTD
18.84%
6M
14.73%
1Y
50.56%
3Y*
21.56%
5Y*
11.97%
10Y*
17.96%

QBDSX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.13%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
0.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSTFX vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QSTFX
Quantified STF Fund
18.84%-2.48%29.94%61.87%-46.15%28.79%78.20%16.43%-6.86%68.46%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
0.13%5.11%1.02%2.25%-4.09%-0.66%-9.22%10.50%-3.17%5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between QSTFX and QBDSX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2015

0.33

The correlation between QSTFX and QBDSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (5 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSTFX vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSTFX
QSTFX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QSTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QSTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

QBDSX
QBDSX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
QBDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QBDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSTFX vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSTFXQBDSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

0.56

+1.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.65

0.83

+1.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.10

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

0.65

+2.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.52

1.83

+5.69

QSTFX vs. QBDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSTFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the QBDSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSTFX and QBDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSTFXQBDSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

0.56

+1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.18

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.15

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.16

+0.41

Drawdowns

QSTFX vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSTFX drawdown since its inception was -49.03%, which is greater than QBDSX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSTFX and QBDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSTFXQBDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.03%

-18.38%

-30.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.87%

-3.09%

-14.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.22%

-3.76%

-28.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.03%

-7.40%

-41.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.03%

-18.38%

-30.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.94%

+7.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.50%

-6.85%

-8.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.97%

1.09%

+5.88%

Volatility

QSTFX vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison

Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 0.67%. This indicates that QSTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSTFXQBDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

0.67%

+5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.89%

2.39%

+16.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.47%

3.60%

+21.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.12%

4.32%

+22.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.90%

5.26%

+22.64%

QSTFX vs. QBDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSTFX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QBDSX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

QSTFX vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison

QSTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.96%, more than QBDSX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
4.47%4.47%3.98%4.51%0.54%0.71%0.87%2.26%2.04%2.51%1.00%3.89%
QSTFX
Quantified STF Fund
8.96%10.65%5.12%1.03%0.00%21.93%20.82%0.52%2.57%39.11%0.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QSTFX and QBDSX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QSTFX has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to QBDSX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSTFX dropped -49.03% vs QBDSX's -18.38%.

QSTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSTFX and QBDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer