QSR vs. BN
QSR (Restaurant Brands International Inc.) and BN (Brookfield Corporation) are both stocks. QSR operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while BN operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, QSR returned 9.02%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for BN. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QSR vs. BN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly higher than BN's -1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR has underperformed BN with an annualized return of 9.02%, while BN has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.
QSR
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 13.67%
- 3Y*
- 3.14%
- 5Y*
- 5.51%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
BN
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -0.68%
- 1Y
- 15.16%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
QSR vs. BN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 10.67% | 8.64% | -13.80% | 24.64% | 10.72% | 2.72% | -0.34% | 25.61% | -12.15% | 30.69% |
BN Brookfield Corporation | -1.31% | 20.54% | 44.18% | 28.60% | -34.80% | 49.30% | 8.99% | 52.68% | -10.65% | 33.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSR and BN is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QSR and BN has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
QSR:
$34.36B
BN:
$107.01B
QSR:
$2.09
BN:
$0.56
QSR:
35.86
BN:
80.05
QSR:
3.57
BN:
1.40
QSR:
9.18
BN:
2.50
QSR:
$9.59B
BN:
$76.58B
QSR:
$3.17B
BN:
$27.02B
QSR:
$2.49B
BN:
$31.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSR vs. BN — Risk / Return Rank
QSR
BN
QSR vs. BN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Brookfield Corporation (BN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSR | BN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.11 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 0.69 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 1.90 | +0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSR vs. BN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, smaller than the maximum BN drawdown of -82.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and BN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSR | BN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.03% | -82.22% | +19.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -22.05% | +8.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.53% | -27.84% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.27% | -41.85% | +12.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.03% | -51.42% | -11.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.35% | -7.89% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.04% | -28.51% | +16.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.04% | 7.99% | -1.95% |
Volatility
QSR vs. BN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) is 5.40%, while Brookfield Corporation (BN) has a volatility of 10.05%. This indicates that QSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSR | BN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 10.05% | -4.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.04% | 22.60% | -5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.04% | 28.82% | -5.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.66% | 31.27% | -8.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 30.17% | -2.65% |
Dividends
QSR vs. BN - Dividend Comparison
QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than BN's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN Brookfield Corporation | 0.55% | 0.52% | 0.56% | 0.70% | 1.44% | 1.12% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.50% |
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 3.35% | 3.63% | 3.56% | 2.82% | 3.34% | 3.49% | 3.40% | 3.14% | 3.44% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.18% |
Financials
QSR vs. BN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Brookfield Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QSR vs. BN - Profitability Comparison
QSR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.43B and revenue of 18.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.
QSR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 606.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.
BN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported an operating income of 4.39B and revenue of 18.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.
QSR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 338.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
BN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a net income of 100.59M and revenue of 18.39B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
QSR and BN have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BN has higher volatility (10.05%) compared to QSR (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSR dropped -63.03% vs BN's -82.22%.
QSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSR and BN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer