QSPRX vs. DMSFX
QSPRX (AQR Style Premia Alternative R6) and DMSFX (Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 5 years, QSPRX returned 20.25%/yr vs 4.25%/yr for DMSFX. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. QSPRX charges 5.79%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for DMSFX.
Performance
QSPRX vs. DMSFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSPRX achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly higher than DMSFX's 0.92% return.
QSPRX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- 6M
- 14.53%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 1Y
- 22.36%
- 3Y*
- 20.82%
- 5Y*
- 20.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.51%
DMSFX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
QSPRX vs. DMSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSPRX AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 | 17.68% | 14.94% | 21.60% | 12.50% | 30.90% | 25.14% | -21.91% | -8.10% | -12.32% | 9.53% |
DMSFX Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund | 0.92% | 3.65% | 6.40% | 12.82% | -3.45% | 5.22% | 10.01% | 8.93% | -4.99% | 2.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSPRX and DMSFX is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017 | -0.09 |
The correlation between QSPRX and DMSFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSPRX vs. DMSFX — Risk / Return Rank
QSPRX
DMSFX
QSPRX vs. DMSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) and Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSPRX | DMSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.36 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.39 | 1.83 | +2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.98 | 5.60 | +6.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSPRX vs. DMSFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSPRX drawdown since its inception was -41.22%, which is greater than DMSFX's maximum drawdown of -21.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSPRX and DMSFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSPRX | DMSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.22% | -21.11% | -20.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.06% | -2.47% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.25% | -5.02% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.17% | -6.84% | -10.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.19% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.95% | -1.58% | -8.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 0.80% | +1.05% |
Volatility
QSPRX vs. DMSFX - Volatility Comparison
AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) has a higher volatility of 2.23% compared to Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) at 0.67%. This indicates that QSPRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSPRX | DMSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.23% | 0.67% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 1.63% | +5.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.63% | 2.47% | +7.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 3.67% | +12.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 4.99% | +7.90% |
QSPRX vs. DMSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSPRX has a 5.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DMSFX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSPRX vs. DMSFX - Dividend Comparison
QSPRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than DMSFX's 4.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMSFX Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund | 4.63% | 3.42% | 6.41% | 6.62% | 3.05% | 4.68% | 1.48% | 4.64% | 4.31% | 2.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QSPRX AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 | 2.24% | 2.63% | 6.99% | 23.75% | 22.67% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 1.62% | 1.09% | 7.15% | 1.74% | 5.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSPRX and DMSFX have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QSPRX has higher volatility (2.23%) compared to DMSFX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSPRX dropped -41.22% vs DMSFX's -21.11%.
QSPRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSPRX and DMSFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer