QSOL vs. QBF
QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) and QBF (Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly) are both exchange-traded funds - QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while QBF is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Innovator. QSOL is passively managed, while QBF is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QBF.
Performance
QSOL vs. QBF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSOL achieves a -43.81% return, which is significantly lower than QBF's -27.01% return.
QSOL
- 1D
- -5.21%
- 1M
- -18.27%
- YTD
- -43.81%
- 6M
- -44.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBF
- 1D
- -3.18%
- 1M
- -14.78%
- YTD
- -27.01%
- 6M
- -27.39%
- 1Y
- -37.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QSOL vs. QBF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -43.81% | -4.28% |
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly | -27.01% | -3.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSOL and QBF is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSOL vs. QBF — Risk / Return Rank
QSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QBF
QSOL vs. QBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSOL | QBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.78 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSOL vs. QBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSOL drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, which is greater than QBF's maximum drawdown of -46.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSOL and QBF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSOL | QBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.55% | -46.35% | -10.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -46.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.76% | -45.44% | -7.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.92% | -17.82% | -16.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 26.21% | — |
Volatility
QSOL vs. QBF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSOL | QBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.31% | 27.20% | +45.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.31% | 29.01% | +43.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.31% | 29.01% | +43.30% |
QSOL vs. QBF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QBF's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSOL vs. QBF - Dividend Comparison
QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than QBF's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly | 1.89% | 1.38% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.99% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSOL and QBF have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBF.
QBF has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.99% for QSOL.
QSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while QBF is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QSOL and 0.79% for QBF.
Find the right allocation for QSOL and QBF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer