PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSMLX vs. QLEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSMLX vs. QLEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund (QSMLX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSMLX achieves a 22.03% return, which is significantly higher than QLEIX's 0.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QSMLX having a 12.39% annualized return and QLEIX not far behind at 12.02%.


QSMLX

1D
0.96%
1M
5.02%
YTD
22.03%
6M
20.37%
1Y
43.86%
3Y*
23.64%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
12.39%

QLEIX

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.51%
YTD
0.38%
6M
4.79%
1Y
16.04%
3Y*
27.72%
5Y*
21.93%
10Y*
12.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSMLX vs. QLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QSMLX
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund
22.03%17.41%11.02%24.01%-18.31%26.54%17.99%20.42%-14.26%9.33%
QLEIX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund
0.38%34.43%30.50%23.95%19.18%31.10%-13.92%1.19%-16.33%15.74%

Correlation

The correlation between QSMLX and QLEIX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.42

The correlation between QSMLX and QLEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSMLX vs. QLEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSMLX
QSMLX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QSMLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSMLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSMLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QSMLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSMLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

QLEIX
QLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSMLX vs. QLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund (QSMLX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSMLXQLEIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

2.26

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

3.32

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.92

2.70

+2.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.76

8.50

+8.27

QSMLX vs. QLEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSMLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the QLEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSMLX and QLEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSMLXQLEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.26

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

2.18

-1.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

1.14

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

1.13

-0.66

Drawdowns

QSMLX vs. QLEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSMLX drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, which is greater than QLEIX's maximum drawdown of -38.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSMLX and QLEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSMLXQLEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

-38.11%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-6.01%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.69%

-7.07%

-16.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

-17.07%

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

-38.11%

-6.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.23%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

-7.73%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

1.91%

+0.82%

Volatility

QSMLX vs. QLEIX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund (QSMLX) has a higher volatility of 5.28% compared to AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) at 2.18%. This indicates that QSMLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSMLXQLEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

2.18%

+3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.55%

5.57%

+7.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.52%

7.24%

+12.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.48%

10.10%

+12.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.19%

10.58%

+12.61%

QSMLX vs. QLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSMLX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than QLEIX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

QSMLX vs. QLEIX - Dividend Comparison

QSMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, more than QLEIX's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLEIX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund
1.75%1.75%7.12%20.88%14.15%0.00%1.57%0.00%6.03%9.11%3.01%4.98%
QSMLX
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund
8.45%10.31%13.88%6.74%0.87%6.13%1.77%0.97%13.57%10.71%2.53%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


QSMLX and QLEIX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QSMLX has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to QLEIX (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSMLX dropped -44.38% vs QLEIX's -38.11%.

QSMLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSMLX and QLEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer