PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSMLX vs. XSHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSMLX vs. XSHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund (QSMLX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSMLX achieves a 25.28% return, which is significantly higher than XSHQ's 11.54% return.


QSMLX

1D
1.20%
1M
4.65%
YTD
25.28%
6M
22.18%
1Y
45.12%
3Y*
24.20%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
13.05%

XSHQ

1D
-0.74%
1M
2.36%
YTD
11.54%
6M
9.12%
1Y
17.70%
3Y*
12.17%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSMLX vs. XSHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QSMLX
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund
25.28%17.41%11.02%24.01%-18.31%26.54%17.99%20.42%-14.26%10.73%
XSHQ
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
11.54%0.89%7.49%23.88%-15.01%23.99%11.81%17.37%-6.11%7.18%

Correlation

The correlation between QSMLX and XSHQ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017

0.88

The correlation between QSMLX and XSHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSMLX vs. XSHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSMLX
QSMLX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QSMLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSMLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSMLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QSMLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSMLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

XSHQ
XSHQ Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XSHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XSHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSMLX vs. XSHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund (QSMLX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QSMLXXSHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.18

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.09

1.73

+3.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.26

4.75

+12.51

QSMLX vs. XSHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSMLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the XSHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSMLX and XSHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QSMLX vs. XSHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSMLX drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, which is greater than XSHQ's maximum drawdown of -38.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSMLX and XSHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSMLXXSHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

-38.33%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-10.27%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.69%

-27.34%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

-27.34%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.74%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.15%

-9.29%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

3.74%

-0.99%

Volatility

QSMLX vs. XSHQ - Volatility Comparison

AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund (QSMLX) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) at 4.09%. This indicates that QSMLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSMLXXSHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

4.09%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.15%

11.87%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.03%

17.52%

+2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.54%

21.22%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.24%

23.09%

+0.15%

QSMLX vs. XSHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSMLX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than XSHQ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

QSMLX vs. XSHQ - Dividend Comparison

QSMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.23%, more than XSHQ's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QSMLX
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund
8.23%10.31%13.88%6.74%0.87%6.13%1.77%0.97%13.57%10.71%2.53%0.22%
XSHQ
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
1.21%1.48%1.18%1.15%2.02%1.25%1.24%1.11%1.16%0.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QSMLX and XSHQ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QSMLX has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to XSHQ (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSMLX dropped -44.38% vs XSHQ's -38.33%.

QSMLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSMLX and XSHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer