QSML vs. DWAS
QSML (Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund) and DWAS (Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSML is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree US SmallCap Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DWAS is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QSML returned 21.62% vs 39.85% for DWAS. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QSML charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DWAS.
Performance
QSML vs. DWAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSML achieves a 8.06% return, which is significantly lower than DWAS's 18.88% return.
QSML
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 8.06%
- 6M
- 7.79%
- 1Y
- 21.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWAS
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- YTD
- 18.88%
- 6M
- 19.17%
- 1Y
- 39.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
QSML vs. DWAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QSML Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund | 8.06% | 5.49% | 10.38% |
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 18.88% | 6.09% | 11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSML and DWAS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between QSML and DWAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
QSML vs. DWAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QSML
DWAS
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
QSML
DWAS
Industrials
QSML
DWAS
Consumer Cyclical
QSML
DWAS
Financial Services
QSML
DWAS
Healthcare
QSML
DWAS
Energy
QSML
DWAS
Consumer Defensive
QSML
DWAS
Communication Services
QSML
DWAS
Basic Materials
QSML
DWAS
Real Estate
QSML
DWAS
Utilities
QSML
DWAS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSML vs. DWAS — Risk / Return Rank
QSML
DWAS
QSML vs. DWAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) and Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QSML | DWAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.29 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 4.00 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.71 | 13.05 | -6.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QSML | DWAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 1.76 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.49 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
QSML vs. DWAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSML drawdown since its inception was -28.54%, smaller than the maximum DWAS drawdown of -46.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSML and DWAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSML | DWAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.54% | -46.16% | +17.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.72% | -10.02% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -1.72% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -10.30% | +4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 3.06% | +0.17% |
Volatility
QSML vs. DWAS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) is 4.35%, while Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that QSML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DWAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSML | DWAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 6.81% | -2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.86% | 16.88% | -5.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.46% | 22.81% | -5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 25.70% | -4.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 26.60% | -5.74% |
QSML vs. DWAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSML has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAS's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSML vs. DWAS - Dividend Comparison
QSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than DWAS's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.79% | 1.42% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.21% | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.52% | 0.19% |
QSML Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund | 0.58% | 0.62% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSML and DWAS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWAS has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to QSML (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSML dropped -28.54% vs DWAS's -46.16%.
On 1-year performance, DWAS leads with 39.85% vs 21.62% for QSML. On fees, QSML is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, QSML has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DWAS has performed better with a 39.85% return vs 21.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QSML is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.
QSML has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.01% for DWAS.
QSML is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while DWAS is Momentum. QSML tracks WisdomTree US SmallCap Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QSML and 0.60% for DWAS.
DWAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSML and DWAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer