QSML vs. DGRS
QSML (Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund) and DGRS (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both Quality Factor funds from WisdomTree - QSML tracks the WisdomTree US SmallCap Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross while DGRS tracks the WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QSML returned 31.80% vs 34.23% for DGRS. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.38% expense ratio.
Performance
QSML vs. DGRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSML achieves a 19.46% return, which is significantly lower than DGRS's 23.92% return.
QSML
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- YTD
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 31.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.80%
DGRS
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 13.41%
- YTD
- 23.92%
- 1Y
- 34.23%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.65M | $2.40M | $1.87M | |
| $17.22K | $17.81K | $19.02K |
QSML vs. DGRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QSML Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund | 19.46% | 5.49% | 9.93% |
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 23.92% | -0.43% | 13.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSML and DGRS is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between QSML and DGRS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
QSML vs. DGRS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QSML
DGRS
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
QSML
DGRS
Consumer Cyclical
QSML
DGRS
Financial Services
QSML
DGRS
Industrials
QSML
DGRS
Healthcare
QSML
DGRS
Consumer Defensive
QSML
DGRS
Energy
QSML
DGRS
Communication Services
QSML
DGRS
Basic Materials
QSML
DGRS
Real Estate
QSML
DGRS
Utilities
QSML
DGRS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSML vs. DGRS — Risk / Return Rank
QSML
DGRS
QSML vs. DGRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSML | DGRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.36 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 3.55 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.05 | 11.35 | -1.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSML vs. DGRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSML drawdown since its inception was -28.54%, smaller than the maximum DGRS drawdown of -44.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSML and DGRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSML | DGRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.54% | -44.83% | +16.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.72% | -9.68% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -6.65% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 3.02% | +0.15% |
Volatility
QSML vs. DGRS - Volatility Comparison
Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) at 4.02%. This indicates that QSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSML | DGRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 4.02% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.38% | 10.67% | +1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.49% | 17.07% | +0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 20.24% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 23.59% | -3.00% |
QSML vs. DGRS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QSML and DGRS have an expense ratio of 0.38%.
Dividends
QSML vs. DGRS - Dividend Comparison
QSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than DGRS's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 2.00% | 2.68% | 2.15% | 2.36% | 2.88% | 2.19% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 1.90% | 1.82% | 2.55% |
QSML Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund | 0.52% | 0.62% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSML and DGRS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QSML has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to DGRS (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSML dropped -28.54% vs DGRS's -44.83%.
On 1-year performance, DGRS leads with 34.23% vs 31.80% for QSML. Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. On volatility, DGRS has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DGRS has performed better with a 34.23% return vs 31.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QSML and DGRS have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.
DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.52% for QSML.
QSML tracks WisdomTree US SmallCap Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DGRS tracks WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index.
DGRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSML and DGRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer