PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSIX vs. GOOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QSIX vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QSIX vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QSIX
Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF
-5.58%18.54%4.66%
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
-11.44%52.46%12.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSIX achieves a -5.58% return, which is significantly higher than GOOP's -11.44% return.


QSIX

1D
3.15%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-5.58%
6M
-3.43%
1Y
20.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOP

1D
5.90%
1M
-9.11%
YTD
-11.44%
6M
11.49%
1Y
63.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QSIX vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOP's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QSIX vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSIX
QSIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOP
GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSIX vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSIXGOOPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.01

2.27

-1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

3.04

-1.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.40

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

2.73

-0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.68

11.23

-4.55

QSIX vs. GOOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the GOOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSIX and GOOP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSIXGOOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

2.27

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

1.18

-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between QSIX and GOOP is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QSIX vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison

QSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than GOOP's 14.11% yield.


TTM202520242023
QSIX
Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF
4.23%4.02%1.07%0.00%
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
14.11%11.79%13.73%2.06%

Drawdowns

QSIX vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSIX drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, smaller than the maximum GOOP drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIX and GOOP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QSIXGOOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.72%

-27.49%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-23.32%

+11.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.24%

-18.80%

+10.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-6.43%

+3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

5.67%

-2.57%

Volatility

QSIX vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) is 5.92%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) has a volatility of 10.39%. This indicates that QSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QSIXGOOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

10.39%

-4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.80%

19.56%

-7.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.44%

28.07%

-7.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

24.61%

-5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.56%

24.61%

-5.05%