PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSIX vs. GOOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSIX vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSIX achieves a 19.16% return, which is significantly higher than GOOP's 17.17% return.


QSIX

1D
-0.45%
1M
8.46%
YTD
19.16%
6M
17.84%
1Y
37.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOP

1D
4.28%
1M
-4.63%
YTD
17.17%
6M
16.35%
1Y
100.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSIX vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QSIX
Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF
19.16%18.54%4.66%
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
17.17%52.46%12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between QSIX and GOOP is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

0.60

The correlation between QSIX and GOOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSIX vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSIX
QSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOP
GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSIX vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSIXGOOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.59

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

4.31

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

16.36

-3.07

QSIX vs. GOOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the GOOP Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSIX and GOOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSIXGOOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

3.53

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

1.59

-0.22

Drawdowns

QSIX vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSIX drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, smaller than the maximum GOOP drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIX and GOOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSIXGOOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.72%

-27.49%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-23.32%

+12.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-8.13%

+7.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-6.29%

+3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

6.14%

-3.33%

Volatility

QSIX vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) is 4.10%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) has a volatility of 10.02%. This indicates that QSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSIXGOOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

10.02%

-5.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.23%

22.96%

-11.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.71%

28.55%

-13.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.16%

26.02%

-6.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.16%

26.02%

-6.86%

QSIX vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOP's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

QSIX vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison

QSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than GOOP's 11.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
11.75%11.79%13.73%2.06%
QSIX
Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF
3.84%4.02%1.07%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QSIX and GOOP have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOP has higher volatility (10.02%) compared to QSIX (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSIX dropped -20.72% vs GOOP's -27.49%.

On 1-year performance, GOOP leads with 100.07% vs 37.26% for QSIX. On fees, QSIX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QSIX has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOP has performed better with a 100.07% return vs 37.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QSIX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOP.

GOOP has the higher dividend yield at 11.75%, compared with 3.84% for QSIX.

QSIX is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while GOOP is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QSIX and 0.99% for GOOP.

GOOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSIX and GOOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer