PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSIG vs. QGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QSIG vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (QSIG) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QSIG vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QSIG
WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund
0.14%6.61%4.65%6.09%-0.66%
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
-7.80%19.20%34.85%56.05%-3.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSIG achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than QGRW's -7.80% return.


QSIG

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
0.14%
6M
1.19%
1Y
4.64%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
2.24%
10Y*

QGRW

1D
1.24%
1M
-4.85%
YTD
-7.80%
6M
-6.06%
1Y
22.02%
3Y*
24.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QSIG vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QSIG vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSIG
QSIG Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
QSIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSIG Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
QSIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSIG Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

QGRW
QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSIG vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (QSIG) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSIGQGRWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

0.91

+1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.27

1.45

+1.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.20

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

1.51

+1.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.71

5.66

+8.05

QSIG vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSIG Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the QGRW Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSIG and QGRW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSIGQGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

0.91

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.32

-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between QSIG and QGRW is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QSIG vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

QSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than QGRW's 0.09% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QSIG
WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund
4.44%4.46%4.37%3.26%2.13%1.66%2.29%2.41%2.27%1.81%0.98%
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
0.09%0.09%0.14%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QSIG vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSIG drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, smaller than the maximum QGRW drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIG and QGRW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QSIGQGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.35%

-24.40%

+12.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.40%

-15.44%

+14.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-10.67%

+9.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.39%

-3.33%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

4.12%

-3.77%

Volatility

QSIG vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (QSIG) is 0.96%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a volatility of 7.91%. This indicates that QSIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QSIGQGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

7.91%

-6.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.32%

13.96%

-12.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13%

24.20%

-22.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.99%

21.23%

-18.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.43%

21.23%

-17.80%