QS vs. XLE
QS (QuantumScape Corporation) is a stock, while XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Over the past 5 years, QS returned -21.06%/yr vs 20.44%/yr for XLE. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QS vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QS achieves a -15.93% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return.
QS
- 1D
- -4.78%
- 1M
- 21.84%
- YTD
- -15.93%
- 6M
- -29.41%
- 1Y
- 114.18%
- 3Y*
- 9.57%
- 5Y*
- -21.06%
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- 32.17%
- 6M
- 29.80%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 20.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
QS vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QS QuantumScape Corporation | -15.93% | 100.77% | -25.32% | 22.57% | -74.45% | -73.72% | 753.03% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 32.17% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between QS and XLE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2020 | 0.16 |
The correlation between QS and XLE shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QS vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
QS
XLE
QS vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QuantumScape Corporation (QS) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QS | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 3.75 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | 10.92 | -8.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QS | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 2.21 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | 0.79 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.31 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
QS vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QS drawdown since its inception was -97.36%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QS and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QS | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.36% | -71.26% | -26.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.68% | -12.05% | -55.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.93% | -20.14% | -53.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.45% | -26.04% | -65.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.35% | -6.15% | -87.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.54% | -17.98% | -67.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.53% | 4.14% | +38.39% |
Volatility
QS vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
QuantumScape Corporation (QS) has a higher volatility of 22.76% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 8.25%. This indicates that QS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QS | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.76% | 8.25% | +14.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.95% | 16.58% | +29.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.34% | 20.53% | +81.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.62% | 26.02% | +59.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.90% | 29.59% | +76.31% |
Dividends
QS vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
QS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QS QuantumScape Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.54% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QS and XLE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QS has higher volatility (22.76%) compared to XLE (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QS dropped -97.36% vs XLE's -71.26%.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QS and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer