PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRSVX vs. SDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QRSVX vs. SDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) and First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRSVX achieves a 24.66% return, which is significantly higher than SDVY's 8.72% return.


QRSVX

1D
-0.28%
1M
6.19%
YTD
24.66%
6M
23.12%
1Y
37.90%
3Y*
21.48%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*

SDVY

1D
0.95%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.43%
1Y
21.92%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRSVX vs. SDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QRSVX
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class
24.66%13.37%10.72%16.04%-9.14%23.16%2.50%
SDVY
First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
8.72%8.83%11.19%28.58%-11.98%29.13%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between QRSVX and SDVY is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2020

0.92

The correlation between QRSVX and SDVY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QRSVX vs. SDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRSVX
QRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
QRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SDVY
SDVY Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRSVX vs. SDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) and First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QRSVXSDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.26

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

2.37

+2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.81

8.17

+8.65

QRSVX vs. SDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRSVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the SDVY Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRSVX and SDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QRSVXSDVYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

1.44

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.41

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.44

+0.39

Drawdowns

QRSVX vs. SDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRSVX drawdown since its inception was -20.59%, smaller than the maximum SDVY drawdown of -44.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRSVX and SDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QRSVXSDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.59%

-44.70%

+24.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.93%

-9.28%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.91%

-25.92%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.59%

-25.92%

+5.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-2.17%

+1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-7.71%

+2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

2.69%

-0.46%

Volatility

QRSVX vs. SDVY - Volatility Comparison

FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY) at 3.92%. This indicates that QRSVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QRSVXSDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

3.92%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

10.91%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

15.32%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

21.04%

-3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

24.82%

-7.33%

QRSVX vs. SDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRSVX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than SDVY's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

QRSVX vs. SDVY - Dividend Comparison

QRSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than SDVY's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QRSVX
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class
3.57%4.45%4.86%2.56%2.07%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDVY
First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
1.19%1.69%1.60%1.90%2.28%1.09%1.48%1.69%1.57%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


QRSVX and SDVY have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QRSVX has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to SDVY (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRSVX dropped -20.59% vs SDVY's -44.70%.

QRSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QRSVX and SDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer