QRMI vs. XPAY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY).

QRMI and XPAY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QRMI is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. XPAY is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Oct 30, 2024.

Performance

QRMI vs. XPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QRMI vs. XPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	-2.50%	3.76%	5.16%
XPAY Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF	-3.96%	16.78%	3.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRMI achieves a -2.50% return, which is significantly higher than XPAY's -3.96% return.

QRMI

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -2.37%
• YTD: -2.50%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 2.76%
• 3Y*: 6.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XPAY

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: -3.96%
• 6M: -2.20%
• 1Y: 17.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRMI vs. XPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XPAY's 0.49% expense ratio.

QRMI

Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF

XPAY

Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF

Return for Risk

QRMI vs. XPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 21
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 20
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 23

XPAY

XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 56
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 57
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRMI vs. XPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QRMI	XPAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	0.96	-0.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.55	1.44	-0.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.22	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	1.53	-0.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.59	6.71	-5.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QRMI vs. XPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the XPAY Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRMI and XPAY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QRMI	XPAY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36	0.96	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.64	-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between QRMI and XPAY is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QRMI vs. XPAY - Dividend Comparison

QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.66%, less than XPAY's 22.92% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.66%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%
XPAY Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF	22.92%	21.21%	3.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QRMI vs. XPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, which is greater than XPAY's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and XPAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	QRMI	XPAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.95%	-18.20%	-2.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.04%	-11.55%	+6.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.54%	-6.03%	+2.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.25%	-2.56%	-5.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	2.63%	-0.89%

Volatility

QRMI vs. XPAY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is 3.02%, while Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that QRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QRMI	XPAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.02%	5.30%	-2.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.93%	9.42%	-4.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.77%	18.05%	-10.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.46%	17.25%	-8.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.46%	17.25%	-8.79%