PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRMI vs. KHPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QRMI vs. KHPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QRMI vs. KHPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
-3.23%3.76%8.58%
KHPI
Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF
-3.49%11.14%4.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRMI achieves a -3.23% return, which is significantly higher than KHPI's -3.49% return.


QRMI

1D
0.82%
1M
-3.01%
YTD
-3.23%
6M
0.78%
1Y
1.99%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
10Y*

KHPI

1D
1.47%
1M
-4.68%
YTD
-3.49%
6M
-0.79%
1Y
10.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QRMI vs. KHPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KHPI's 0.96% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QRMI vs. KHPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI
QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

KHPI
KHPI Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
KHPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KHPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
KHPI Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
KHPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
KHPI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRMI vs. KHPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QRMIKHPIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.26

0.97

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.41

1.46

-1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.22

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

1.64

-1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.19

7.34

-6.15

QRMI vs. KHPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the KHPI Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRMI and KHPI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QRMIKHPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

0.97

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.76

-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between QRMI and KHPI is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QRMI vs. KHPI - Dividend Comparison

QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.76%, more than KHPI's 9.44% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.76%12.28%11.80%12.44%10.65%3.36%
KHPI
Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF
9.44%8.90%3.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QRMI vs. KHPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, which is greater than KHPI's maximum drawdown of -10.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and KHPI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QRMIKHPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-10.58%

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.04%

-6.55%

+1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.26%

-5.18%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-1.27%

-6.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.46%

+0.26%

Volatility

QRMI vs. KHPI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is 2.90%, while Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that QRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KHPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QRMIKHPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

3.18%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.87%

5.25%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.74%

10.96%

-3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.46%

9.79%

-1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.46%

9.79%

-1.33%