PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QREARX vs. TILGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QREARX vs. TILGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QREARX achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly higher than TILGX's 0.31% return.


QREARX

1D
0.02%
1M
0.32%
6M
2.31%
YTD
2.46%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.09%

TILGX

1D
3.40%
1M
-2.44%
6M
1.21%
YTD
0.31%
1Y
8.05%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
15.61%
ALL TIME*
11.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

QREARX vs. TILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QREARX and TILGX is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QREARX vs. TILGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QREARX
QREARX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
QREARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QREARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
QREARX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
QREARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
QREARX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

TILGX
TILGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
TILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QREARX vs. TILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QREARXTILGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+10.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.33

1.07

+2.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.94

0.37

+14.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

61.13

1.13

+59.99

QREARX vs. TILGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QREARX Sharpe Ratio is 4.42, which is higher than the TILGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QREARX and TILGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QREARX vs. TILGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QREARX drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum TILGX drawdown of -52.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QREARX and TILGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QREARXTILGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-52.16%

+50.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.29%

-15.19%

+14.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-7.30%

+7.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-8.81%

+8.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

4.94%

-4.87%

Volatility

QREARX vs. TILGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) is 0.10%, while TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that QREARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QREARXTILGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.10%

6.52%

-6.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.86%

13.36%

-12.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99%

17.42%

-16.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.69%

22.14%

-20.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.69%

21.70%

-20.01%

QREARX vs. TILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QREARX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than TILGX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

QREARX vs. TILGX - Dividend Comparison

QREARX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QREARX
TIAA Real Estate Account
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TILGX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class
13.83%13.87%6.41%0.22%0.42%10.49%37.04%4.41%14.12%3.83%1.82%3.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


QREARX and TILGX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TILGX has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to QREARX (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QREARX dropped -1.45% vs TILGX's -52.16%.

QREARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.42 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QREARX and TILGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer