PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQXT vs. QQQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQXT vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQXT achieves a -1.57% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 65.37% return.


QQXT

1D
-0.25%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
-1.57%
6M
-1.64%
1Y
-0.05%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
4.06%
10Y*
10.01%

QQQA

1D
2.20%
1M
23.31%
YTD
65.37%
6M
67.98%
1Y
88.43%
3Y*
34.58%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQXT vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQXT
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund
-1.57%8.02%6.71%16.81%-13.09%6.99%
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
65.37%9.87%16.17%24.98%-29.08%8.43%

Correlation

The correlation between QQXT and QQQA is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between QQXT and QQQA has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QQXT vs. QQQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQXT
QQQA

Consumer Cyclical

17.6%
4.2%

Healthcare

16.9%
7.8%

Industrials

16.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

15.1%

-

Communication Services

11.9%
13.7%

Utilities

7.6%

-

Technology

5.7%
65.2%

Energy

3.9%
9.1%

Financial Services

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

QQXT
17.6%
QQQA
4.2%

Healthcare

QQXT
16.9%
QQQA
7.8%

Industrials

QQXT
16.1%
QQQA

-

Consumer Defensive

QQXT
15.1%
QQQA

-

Communication Services

QQXT
11.9%
QQQA
13.7%

Utilities

QQXT
7.6%
QQQA

-

Technology

QQXT
5.7%
QQQA
65.2%

Energy

QQXT
3.9%
QQQA
9.1%

Financial Services

QQXT
2.0%
QQQA

-

Basic Materials

QQXT
1.8%
QQQA

-

Real Estate

QQXT
1.4%
QQQA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQXT vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQXT
QQXT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
QQXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQXT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
QQXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQXT Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQXT vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQXTQQQADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.54

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

6.11

-6.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.01

22.85

-22.86

QQXT vs. QQQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQXT Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the QQQA Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQXT and QQQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQXTQQQADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

3.41

-3.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.57

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.59

-0.13

Drawdowns

QQXT vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQXT drawdown since its inception was -57.45%, which is greater than QQQA's maximum drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXT and QQQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQXTQQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.45%

-38.44%

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-14.54%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-30.84%

+15.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.74%

-38.44%

+13.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.98%

0.00%

-5.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-15.68%

+7.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

3.88%

-0.70%

Volatility

QQXT vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) is 2.44%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that QQXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQXTQQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

10.17%

-7.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.65%

22.18%

-14.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

26.05%

-15.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

25.83%

-9.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

25.77%

-8.23%

QQXT vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQXT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQXT vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison

QQXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than QQQA's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.06%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQXT
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund
1.23%1.20%0.98%1.10%0.92%0.35%0.28%0.35%0.38%0.32%0.31%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQXT and QQQA have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQA has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to QQXT (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQXT dropped -57.45% vs QQQA's -38.44%.

On 5-year performance, QQQA leads with 14.74% vs 4.06% for QQXT. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QQXT has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 14.74% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QQXT.

QQXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.

QQXT tracks NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QQXT and 0.58% for QQQA.

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQXT and QQQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer