QQXT vs. COMT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQXT (First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQXT is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. QQXT is passively managed, while COMT is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQXT returned 10.01%/yr vs 9.09%/yr for COMT. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQXT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.

Performance

QQXT vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQXT achieves a -1.57% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return. Over the past 10 years, QQXT has outperformed COMT with an annualized return of 10.01%, while COMT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.09% annualized return.

QQXT

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -0.88%
• YTD: -1.57%
• 6M: -1.64%
• 1Y: -0.05%
• 3Y*: 7.28%
• 5Y*: 4.06%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

COMT

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: 39.67%
• 6M: 39.06%
• 1Y: 47.51%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: 9.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQXT vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund	-1.57%	8.02%	6.71%	16.81%	-13.09%	12.02%	36.85%	28.02%	-5.74%	20.69%
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	39.67%	6.07%	5.96%	-6.56%	19.45%	36.88%	-18.66%	10.81%	-6.67%	11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between QQXT and COMT is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2014	0.23

The correlation between QQXT and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQXT vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQXT	COMT
Consumer Cyclical	17.6%	-
Healthcare	16.9%	-
Industrials	16.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	15.1%	-
Communication Services	11.9%	-
Utilities	7.6%	-
Technology	5.7%	-
Energy	3.9%	-
Financial Services	2.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	1.8%	-
Real Estate	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

QQXT vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQXT

QQXT Risk / Return Rank: 8
QQXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
QQXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
QQXT Omega Ratio Rank: 8
QQXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
QQXT Martin Ratio Rank: 9

COMT

COMT Risk / Return Rank: 71
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQXT vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQXT	COMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.00	2.24	-2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.07	2.88	-2.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.40	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.01	5.95	-5.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.01	14.11	-14.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQXT vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQXT Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQXT and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQXT	COMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00	2.24	-2.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.64	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.48	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.20	+0.25

Drawdowns

QQXT vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQXT drawdown since its inception was -57.45%, which is greater than COMT's maximum drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXT and COMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQXT	COMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.45%	-51.89%	-5.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.59%	-8.02%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.92%	-13.31%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.74%	-29.00%	+4.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.40%	-39.22%	+8.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.98%	-4.82%	-1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.11%	-24.07%	+15.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	3.38%	-0.20%

Volatility

QQXT vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) is 2.44%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that QQXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQXT	COMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.44%	7.37%	-4.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.65%	18.80%	-11.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.77%	21.29%	-10.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.25%	21.06%	-4.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.54%	18.89%	-1.35%

QQXT vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQXT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQXT vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

QQXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	5.54%	7.74%	4.90%	5.19%	29.79%	17.79%	0.36%	2.61%	11.65%	5.16%	0.52%	1.44%
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund	1.23%	1.20%	0.98%	1.10%	0.92%	0.35%	0.28%	0.35%	0.38%	0.32%	0.31%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQXT and COMT in my portfolio?

QQXT and COMT have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQXT or COMT?

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to QQXT (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQXT dropped -57.45% vs COMT's -51.89%.

Which ETF is better, QQXT or COMT?

On 10-year performance, QQXT leads with 10.01% vs 9.09% for COMT. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, QQXT has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQXT or COMT?

Over the 10-year period, QQXT has performed better with a 10.01% return vs 9.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQXT or COMT?

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QQXT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQXT or COMT?

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 1.23% for QQXT.

What is the main difference between QQXT and COMT?

QQXT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QQXT and 0.48% for COMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.