QQXT vs. CMDT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QQXT (First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund) and CMDT (PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QQXT is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while CMDT is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQXT returned 6.63%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for CMDT. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQXT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMDT.

Performance

QQXT vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQXT achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than CMDT's 13.43% return.

QQXT

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -1.96%
• YTD: -2.44%
• 6M: -2.95%
• 1Y: 0.72%
• 3Y*: 6.63%
• 5Y*: 3.50%
• 10Y*: 10.59%

CMDT

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -8.86%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 6M: 13.42%
• 1Y: 21.34%
• 3Y*: 12.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQXT vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund	-2.44%	8.02%	6.71%	9.22%
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	13.43%	12.78%	6.93%	5.37%

Correlation

The correlation between QQXT and CMDT is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2023	0.06

The correlation between QQXT and CMDT shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QQXT vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQXT

QQXT Risk / Return Rank: 9
QQXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
QQXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
QQXT Omega Ratio Rank: 9
QQXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
QQXT Martin Ratio Rank: 10

CMDT

CMDT Risk / Return Rank: 50
CMDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CMDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CMDT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
CMDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CMDT Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQXT vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQXT	CMDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	1.71	-1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	2.39	-2.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.29	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	1.93	-1.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	9.62	-9.41

QQXT vs. CMDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the CMDT Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQXT and CMDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQXT vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQXT drawdown since its inception was -57.45%, which is greater than CMDT's maximum drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXT and CMDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQXT	CMDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.45%	-11.11%	-46.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.59%	-11.11%	+3.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.92%	-11.11%	-3.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.81%	-11.11%	+4.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.10%	-2.77%	-5.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	2.25%	+1.18%

Volatility

QQXT vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) is 3.00%, while PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that QQXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQXT	CMDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.00%	3.26%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.95%	10.60%	-2.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.92%	12.65%	-1.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.27%	12.24%	+4.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.49%	12.24%	+5.25%

QQXT vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQXT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQXT vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison

QQXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than CMDT's 2.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	2.67%	3.04%	8.80%	2.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund	1.24%	1.20%	0.98%	1.10%	0.92%	0.35%	0.28%	0.35%	0.38%	0.32%	0.31%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQXT and CMDT in my portfolio?

QQXT and CMDT have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQXT or CMDT?

CMDT has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to QQXT (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQXT dropped -57.45% vs CMDT's -11.11%.

Which ETF is better, QQXT or CMDT?

On 3-year performance, CMDT leads with 12.77% vs 6.63% for QQXT. On fees, QQXT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QQXT has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQXT or CMDT?

Over the 3-year period, CMDT has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQXT or CMDT?

QQXT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMDT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQXT or CMDT?

CMDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 1.24% for QQXT.

What is the main difference between QQXT and CMDT?

QQXT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CMDT is Commodities. QQXT tracks NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while CMDT tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QQXT and 0.65% for CMDT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.