QQXT vs. ACSI

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

QQXT (First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund) and ACSI (American Customer Satisfaction ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQXT is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while ACSI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQXT returned 3.88%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for ACSI. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QQXT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for ACSI.

Performance

QQXT vs. ACSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQXT achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than ACSI's 15.80% return.

QQXT

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 0.95%
• 6M: 0.82%
• YTD: 1.95%
• 1Y: 4.55%
• 3Y*: 6.80%
• 5Y*: 3.88%
• 10Y*: 10.10%
• ALL TIME*: 9.15%

ACSI

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: 3.09%
• 6M: 14.08%
• YTD: 15.80%
• 1Y: 23.91%
• 3Y*: 18.93%
• 5Y*: 9.66%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF	$12.55K	$23.38K	$20.10K
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund	$265.60K	$403.02K	$549.03K

QQXT vs. ACSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund	1.95%	8.02%	6.71%	16.81%	-13.09%	12.02%	36.85%	28.02%	-5.74%	20.69%
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF	15.80%	10.70%	22.51%	21.06%	-20.93%	23.33%	22.93%	24.88%	-4.97%	15.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QQXT and ACSI is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2016	0.79

The correlation between QQXT and ACSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQXT vs. ACSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQXT	ACSI
Consumer Cyclical	17.1%	24.2%
Industrials	17.0%	7.3%
Healthcare	17.0%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	15.4%	12.4%
Communication Services	11.1%	15.4%
Technology	7.6%	12.5%
Utilities	7.6%	3.9%
Energy	3.4%	3.4%
Basic Materials	2.0%	-
Financial Services	1.8%	9.6%
Real Estate	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

QQXT vs. ACSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQXT

QQXT Risk / Return Rank: 20
QQXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
QQXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
QQXT Omega Ratio Rank: 18
QQXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
QQXT Martin Ratio Rank: 20

ACSI

ACSI Risk / Return Rank: 82
ACSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ACSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
ACSI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
ACSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ACSI Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQXT vs. ACSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQXT	ACSI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	2.03	-1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.67	2.84	-2.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.35	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	3.09	-2.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.30	11.86	-10.56

QQXT vs. ACSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the ACSI Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQXT and ACSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQXT vs. ACSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQXT drawdown since its inception was -57.45%, which is greater than ACSI's maximum drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXT and ACSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQXT	ACSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.45%	-34.49%	-22.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.59%	-7.76%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.92%	-15.27%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.74%	-24.86%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.61%	0.00%	-2.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.08%	-5.32%	-2.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.52%	2.02%	+1.50%

Volatility

QQXT vs. ACSI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) at 3.74%. This indicates that QQXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQXT	ACSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	3.74%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	9.51%	-0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.18%	11.86%	-0.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.34%	16.67%	-0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.48%	17.35%	+0.13%

QQXT vs. ACSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQXT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ACSI's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQXT vs. ACSI - Dividend Comparison

QQXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than ACSI's 0.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF	0.79%	0.91%	0.69%	1.01%	0.81%	0.31%	0.82%	1.64%	1.59%	1.20%	0.18%	0.00%
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund	1.22%	1.20%	0.98%	1.10%	0.92%	0.35%	0.28%	0.35%	0.38%	0.32%	0.31%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQXT and ACSI in my portfolio?

QQXT and ACSI have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQXT or ACSI?

QQXT has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to ACSI (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQXT dropped -57.45% vs ACSI's -34.49%.

Which ETF is better, QQXT or ACSI?

On 5-year performance, ACSI leads with 9.66% vs 3.88% for QQXT. On fees, QQXT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, ACSI has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQXT or ACSI?

Over the 5-year period, ACSI has performed better with a 9.66% return vs 3.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQXT or ACSI?

QQXT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for ACSI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQXT or ACSI?

QQXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.79% for ACSI.

What is the main difference between QQXT and ACSI?

QQXT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ACSI is Large Cap Growth Equities. QQXT tracks NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while ACSI tracks American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Exponential ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QQXT and 0.66% for ACSI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.