QQUP vs. SAA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QQUP (ProShares Ultra Top QQQ) and SAA (ProShares Ultra SmallCap600) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - QQUP tracks the Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%) while SAA tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQUP returned 38.57% vs 66.49% for SAA. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

QQUP vs. SAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQUP achieves a -3.91% return, which is significantly lower than SAA's 36.86% return.

QQUP

• 1D: -3.22%
• 1M: -16.85%
• YTD: -3.91%
• 6M: -6.57%
• 1Y: 38.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SAA

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 8.20%
• YTD: 36.86%
• 6M: 31.50%
• 1Y: 66.49%
• 3Y*: 21.67%
• 5Y*: 2.49%
• 10Y*: 12.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQUP vs. SAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ	-3.91%	45.33%
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600	36.86%	18.78%

Correlation

The correlation between QQUP and SAA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025	0.40

Return for Risk

QQUP vs. SAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQUP

QQUP Risk / Return Rank: 26
QQUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
QQUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
QQUP Omega Ratio Rank: 27
QQUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
QQUP Martin Ratio Rank: 23

SAA

SAA Risk / Return Rank: 63
SAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SAA Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SAA Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQUP vs. SAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQUP	SAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	1.85	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	2.55	-1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.30	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	3.67	-2.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.87	11.94	-9.06

QQUP vs. SAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQUP Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the SAA Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQUP and SAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQUP vs. SAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQUP drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, smaller than the maximum SAA drawdown of -87.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQUP and SAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQUP	SAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.67%	-87.39%	+49.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.67%	-18.21%	-19.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.37%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-74.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.46%	-0.69%	-20.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.48%	-27.35%	+17.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.45%	5.59%	+7.86%

Volatility

QQUP vs. SAA - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) has a higher volatility of 14.01% compared to ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) at 9.60%. This indicates that QQUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQUP	SAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.01%	9.60%	+4.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.62%	24.43%	+6.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.03%	36.09%	+3.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.79%	43.53%	-3.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.79%	46.15%	-6.36%

QQUP vs. SAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQUP and SAA have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

QQUP vs. SAA - Dividend Comparison

QQUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than SAA's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ	0.50%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600	0.74%	1.05%	1.36%	0.88%	0.46%	0.00%	0.03%	0.35%	0.27%	0.00%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQUP and SAA in my portfolio?

QQUP and SAA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQUP or SAA?

QQUP has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to SAA (9.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQUP dropped -37.67% vs SAA's -87.39%.

Which ETF is better, QQUP or SAA?

On 1-year performance, SAA leads with 66.49% vs 38.57% for QQUP. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SAA has been the lower-risk option at 9.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQUP or SAA?

Over the 1-year period, SAA has performed better with a 66.49% return vs 38.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQUP or SAA?

QQUP and SAA have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQUP or SAA?

SAA has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.50% for QQUP.

What is the main difference between QQUP and SAA?

QQUP tracks Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%), while SAA tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.