PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQUP vs. QBIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQUP vs. QBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQUP achieves a -3.91% return, which is significantly lower than QBIG's -0.09% return.


QQUP

1D
-3.22%
1M
-16.85%
YTD
-3.91%
6M
-6.57%
1Y
38.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QBIG

1D
-1.88%
1M
-8.50%
YTD
-0.09%
6M
-1.48%
1Y
22.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQUP vs. QBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QQUP
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ
-3.91%45.33%
QBIG
Invesco Top QQQ ETF
-0.09%23.61%

Correlation

The correlation between QQUP and QBIG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.98

The correlation between QQUP and QBIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQUP vs. QBIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQUP
QQUP Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
QQUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQUP Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
QQUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQUP Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

QBIG
QBIG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
QBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
QBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQUP vs. QBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQUPQBIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.20

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

1.17

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.87

3.51

-0.64

QQUP vs. QBIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQUP Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the QBIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQUP and QBIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQUP vs. QBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQUP drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, which is greater than QBIG's maximum drawdown of -30.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQUP and QBIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQUPQBIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.67%

-30.33%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.67%

-19.70%

-17.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.46%

-11.23%

-10.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-7.04%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.45%

6.56%

+6.89%

Volatility

QQUP vs. QBIG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) has a higher volatility of 14.01% compared to Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) at 7.26%. This indicates that QQUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQUPQBIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.01%

7.26%

+6.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.62%

15.64%

+14.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.03%

20.43%

+19.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.79%

27.41%

+12.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.79%

27.41%

+12.38%

QQUP vs. QBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQUP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QBIG's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQUP vs. QBIG - Dividend Comparison

QQUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while QBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
QBIG
Invesco Top QQQ ETF
0.00%0.00%
QQUP
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ
0.50%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, QQUP and QBIG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQUP has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to QBIG (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQUP dropped -37.67% vs QBIG's -30.33%.

On 1-year performance, QQUP leads with 38.57% vs 22.99% for QBIG. On fees, QBIG is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QBIG has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQUP has performed better with a 38.57% return vs 22.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QBIG is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQUP.

QQUP has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for QBIG.

QQUP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QBIG is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQUP and 0.29% for QBIG.

QBIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQUP and QBIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer