QQUP vs. NRGU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU).

QQUP and NRGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQUP is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 10, 2025. NRGU is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 9, 2019. Both QQUP and NRGU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

QQUP vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QQUP vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ	-21.45%	44.45%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	139.49%	-1.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQUP achieves a -21.45% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 139.49% return.

QQUP

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: -8.10%
• YTD: -21.45%
• 6M: -20.61%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: -10.75%
• 1M: 24.81%
• YTD: 139.49%
• 6M: 107.68%
• 1Y: 69.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQUP vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQUP and NRGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

QQUP

ProShares Ultra Top QQQ

NRGU

MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN

Return for Risk

QQUP vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 45
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 54
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQUP vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQUP	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.61	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between QQUP and NRGU is -0.13. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

QQUP vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

QQUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ	0.61%	0.29%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QQUP vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQUP drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, smaller than the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQUP and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQUP	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.67%	-57.50%	+19.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-55.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.55%	-17.40%	-13.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.16%	-25.38%	+16.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	27.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQUP	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	23.31%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	50.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.72%	88.18%	-49.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.72%	87.12%	-48.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.72%	87.12%	-48.40%