QQQY vs. VT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

QQQY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. QQQY is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQY returned 29.70% vs 25.83% for VT. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

QQQY vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 11.06% return.

QQQY

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 15.43%
• 6M: 15.99%
• 1Y: 29.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VT

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 6M: 11.82%
• 1Y: 25.83%
• 3Y*: 19.71%
• 5Y*: 10.65%
• 10Y*: 12.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQY vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF	15.43%	14.96%	7.70%	7.19%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	11.06%	22.43%	16.49%	7.58%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY and VT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023	0.82

The correlation between QQQY and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQQY vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY

QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 68
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 74
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 69

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 68
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQY	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.94	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	2.67	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.35	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.68	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.96	11.67	-0.71

QQQY vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQY vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQY	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.05%	-50.27%	+31.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.14%	-9.67%	-1.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.41%	-1.92%	-1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.92%	-7.01%	+4.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	2.22%	+0.50%

Volatility

QQQY vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a higher volatility of 7.00% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 5.26%. This indicates that QQQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQY	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.00%	5.26%	+1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.87%	11.01%	+1.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.92%	13.38%	+1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.12%	16.15%	-1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.12%	17.27%	-2.15%

QQQY vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQY vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.39%, more than VT's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF	35.39%	45.34%	83.34%	20.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.61%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQY and VT in my portfolio?

QQQY and VT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQY or VT?

QQQY has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to VT (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQY dropped -19.05% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which ETF is better, QQQY or VT?

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 29.70% vs 25.83% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQY or VT?

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 29.70% return vs 25.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQY or VT?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQY or VT?

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 35.39%, compared with 1.61% for VT.

What is the main difference between QQQY and VT?

QQQY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for QQQY and 0.06% for VT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.