PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQY vs. QTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQY vs. QTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY achieves a 18.85% return, which is significantly lower than QTEC's 43.17% return.


QQQY

1D
-0.19%
1M
7.95%
YTD
18.85%
6M
18.67%
1Y
35.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTEC

1D
-1.08%
1M
18.57%
YTD
43.17%
6M
39.34%
1Y
64.90%
3Y*
32.59%
5Y*
17.36%
10Y*
22.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQY vs. QTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
18.85%14.96%7.70%7.22%
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
43.17%22.28%7.32%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY and QTEC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.85

The correlation between QQQY and QTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQY vs. QTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

QTEC
QTEC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY vs. QTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQYQTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.45

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

4.07

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.65

13.17

+0.48

QQQY vs. QTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the QTEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY and QTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQYQTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.84

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.60

+0.64

Drawdowns

QQQY vs. QTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, smaller than the maximum QTEC drawdown of -58.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY and QTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQYQTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.05%

-58.86%

+39.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-16.03%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-1.08%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-9.89%

+6.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

4.94%

-2.33%

Volatility

QQQY vs. QTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) is 4.14%, while First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a volatility of 7.51%. This indicates that QQQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQYQTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

7.51%

-3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

18.24%

-6.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.66%

22.97%

-9.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.74%

29.17%

-14.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.74%

27.50%

-12.76%

QQQY vs. QTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QTEC's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQY vs. QTEC - Dividend Comparison

QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.18%, while QTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
35.18%45.34%83.34%20.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.02%0.14%0.15%0.02%0.44%0.68%0.91%0.80%1.29%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQY and QTEC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTEC has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to QQQY (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQY dropped -19.05% vs QTEC's -58.86%.

On 1-year performance, QTEC leads with 64.90% vs 35.59% for QQQY. On fees, QTEC is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQY has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QTEC has performed better with a 64.90% return vs 35.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTEC is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 35.18%, compared with 0.00% for QTEC.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for QQQY and 0.57% for QTEC.

QTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQY and QTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer