QQQY vs. QNXT
QQQY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF) and QNXT (iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQY is actively managed, while QNXT is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQY returned 36.38% vs 25.34% for QNXT. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QNXT.
Performance
QQQY vs. QNXT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQY achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly higher than QNXT's 15.67% return.
QQQY
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 9.64%
- YTD
- 19.07%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 36.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QNXT
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 9.65%
- YTD
- 15.67%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- 1Y
- 25.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY vs. QNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 19.07% | 14.96% | -1.46% |
QNXT iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF | 15.67% | 14.97% | -2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQY and QNXT is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024 | 0.80 |
The correlation between QQQY and QNXT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQY vs. QNXT — Risk / Return Rank
QQQY
QNXT
QQQY vs. QNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQY | QNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.29 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 2.50 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.95 | 8.17 | +5.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQY | QNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 1.70 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.90 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
QQQY vs. QNXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQY drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, smaller than the maximum QNXT drawdown of -22.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY and QNXT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQY | QNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.05% | -22.25% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.14% | -10.16% | -0.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.61% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.91% | -3.79% | +0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 3.11% | -0.50% |
Volatility
QQQY vs. QNXT - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) at 3.52%. This indicates that QQQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQY | QNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 3.52% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 10.92% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.67% | 15.05% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 19.73% | -4.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 19.73% | -4.98% |
QQQY vs. QNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QNXT's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQY vs. QNXT - Dividend Comparison
QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.34%, more than QNXT's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QNXT iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.22% | 0.00% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 34.34% | 45.34% | 83.34% | 20.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQY and QNXT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to QNXT (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQY dropped -19.05% vs QNXT's -22.25%.
On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 36.38% vs 25.34% for QNXT. On fees, QNXT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QNXT has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 36.38% return vs 25.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QNXT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.
QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 34.34%, compared with 0.60% for QNXT.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for QQQY and 0.20% for QNXT.
QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQY and QNXT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer