PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQY vs. QNXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQY vs. QNXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly higher than QNXT's 15.67% return.


QQQY

1D
-0.36%
1M
9.64%
YTD
19.07%
6M
19.11%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QNXT

1D
-0.61%
1M
9.65%
YTD
15.67%
6M
13.13%
1Y
25.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQY vs. QNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
19.07%14.96%-1.46%
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
15.67%14.97%-2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY and QNXT is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024

0.80

The correlation between QQQY and QNXT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQY vs. QNXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

QNXT
QNXT Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
QNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY vs. QNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQYQNXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.29

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

2.50

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.95

8.17

+5.78

QQQY vs. QNXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the QNXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY and QNXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQYQNXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

1.70

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.90

+0.35

Drawdowns

QQQY vs. QNXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, smaller than the maximum QNXT drawdown of -22.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY and QNXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQYQNXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.05%

-22.25%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-10.16%

-0.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.61%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-3.79%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

3.11%

-0.50%

Volatility

QQQY vs. QNXT - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) at 3.52%. This indicates that QQQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQYQNXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

3.52%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

10.92%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

15.05%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

19.73%

-4.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

19.73%

-4.98%

QQQY vs. QNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QNXT's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQY vs. QNXT - Dividend Comparison

QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.34%, more than QNXT's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
0.60%0.64%0.22%0.00%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
34.34%45.34%83.34%20.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQY and QNXT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to QNXT (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQY dropped -19.05% vs QNXT's -22.25%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 36.38% vs 25.34% for QNXT. On fees, QNXT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QNXT has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 36.38% return vs 25.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QNXT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 34.34%, compared with 0.60% for QNXT.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for QQQY and 0.20% for QNXT.

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQY and QNXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer