QQQY vs. AIPO
QQQY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while AIPO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. QQQY is actively managed, while AIPO is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
QQQY vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQY achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 52.03% return.
QQQY
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 9.64%
- YTD
- 19.07%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 36.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIPO
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 52.03%
- 6M
- 45.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 19.07% | 6.73% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 52.03% | 8.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQY and AIPO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQY vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQY
AIPO
QQQY vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.95 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 2.36 | -1.10 |
Drawdowns
QQQY vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQY drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.05% | -17.31% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -1.12% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.91% | -4.38% | +1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | — | — |
Volatility
QQQY vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.67% | 34.09% | -20.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 34.09% | -19.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 34.09% | -19.34% |
QQQY vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQY vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.34%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 34.34% | 45.34% | 83.34% | 20.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQY and AIPO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.
QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 34.34%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
QQQY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while AIPO is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for QQQY and 0.69% for AIPO.
Find the right allocation for QQQY and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer